Comments Posted By Rick Moran
Displaying 791 To 800 Of 1317 Comments
ANN COULTER: CONSERVATIVE LOUT
"...in the wake of this selfsame “lout†Coulter’s publication of her book “Treason.†(great term, Rick)"
One of Daddy's favorites, of course.
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 8.06.2006 @ 18:24
Jim:
You never checked under my pillow for an autographed copy of Mein Kampf?
Wallis is a thoughtful man - a "clean" thinker in that his sermons seem firmly grounded in both Christian dogma and some of the ideas espoused by Christian intellectuals from the 1960's who borrowed liberally (there's that word!) from the social Christian radicals of Europe of the 1930's. He also echoes some themes of that fellow Milbank at UVA who calls himself a "post modernist" Christian.
Whether Jesus would have approved of capitalism or not, I personally see Wallis's ideas regarding "social justice" as equally dangerous as the Christian right's "social activism." Anytime anyone starts invoking the name of God to affect changes in government policy, I get suspicious. Better to let Ceasar have his, and if you're a mind to, give God some too.
And The Atlantic gave Zarqawi the full "treatment" today. Headline: "The Short, Violent Life of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi" - as if he was some death row inmate they were trying to spring.
Un. Real.
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 8.06.2006 @ 18:12
Why not be honest? Denying the ad stifles nothing but does hit your pocketbook.
I was waiting for some nitwit to make that very statement.
The only money I make from this site is from PJM ads for which I receive a grand total of $375.00 every 3 months. Considering that I spend 8-10 hours a day during the week and about 6 hours a day on the weekend at the computer tending this beast of a blog, that works out to a grand total of about $.30 per hour!
Hitting my pocketbook? Get real.
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 8.06.2006 @ 16:59
My Goodness! So many made up words that you may have invented your own language.
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 8.06.2006 @ 09:25
Tom W:
How do you sleep??!!
Very well thank you...especially after reading your meaningless, insufferable drivel. Reading ignorant, self important comments like yours acts just like a sedative.
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 7.06.2006 @ 21:29
Dejah Thoris:
Tars Tarkas is out today so I'll answer your screed...
Can't say much about your knowledge of history - pretty damn selective if you ask me.
And why is the default position of people who come here and insult me that I will automatically delete their comment?
You look pretty idiotic now, don't you? Or at least more idiotic than you did by simply mouthing a bunch of idiocies about the right.
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 7.06.2006 @ 16:59
Mr. Wolverine:
Congratulations on perhaps the most incoherent, ignorant, worst grammatical comment ever left on this site.
I'd give you a prize but I'm fresh out of dogsh*t.
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 7.06.2006 @ 11:11
I'll forgive your nauseating condenscension but only because it's apparent you are too ignorant to have read the entire post.
For the last time...there are other ways to skewer these moonbat ladies than accusing them of "enjoying" the fact that their husbands are dead. What part of that don't you understand?
I was trying to count syllables there and I think I used a couple of words that had more than two so I hope I made it sufficiently clear...
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 7.06.2006 @ 10:45
Ted Rall makes Coulter look like a boy scout - plus he draws savage cartoons the likes of which used to be seen only in public restroom toilets.
And I guess every commenter who refers to Bush and Republicans as "Hitler" and Nazis" is okay in your book?
There isn't enough time in the day to criticize that number of pople.
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 7.06.2006 @ 10:19
I really am kind of puzzled.
I thought I made it very clear that there are ways to criticize these women without accusing them of such slanderous calumny. In fact, everyone who has criticized the "Jersey Girls" in the comments has done an infintitely better job of it than Coulter did.
Coulter should be recognized for what she is - a shameless dealer in hate speech. She has crossed the line between making fun of someone (something she used to do so riotiously well) and being hateful and hurtful. It is a fine line and she seems to have abandoned herself to the latter in order to sell books and maintain her image as a "controversial" commentator.
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 7.06.2006 @ 09:09
