James...I was kidding.
And yes, I take full responsibility for the spoiler.
And someone tell Mr. "Wrong" that he should hide his IP address better. That will mask his identity.
That's a pretty good act you two fellas have there...you oughta take it to broadway!Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 23.05.2005 @ 21:02
Technically, it's not a spoiler cause it was in the teaser.
And you guys have both hurt my feelings and caused me to weep uncontrollably. But I suppose it's too late to take it out because you guys both mentioned it in the comments.
So, in a way...IT'S YOUR FAULT!
From here on out, everyone blame Mr. Wright and Mr. Maryhunter for the spoiler. I'm off the hook.Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 23.05.2005 @ 16:54
Pat: Had a coming out post last week...I picked a helluva week to stop sniffing glue!
As far as the shame of the WHPC...their job is to ask questions. You don't like the way they do it, get in touch with their news organs and tell them.
And I take your comment as an insult to me - or didn't you read the post? Be that as it may, I disagree that shame is anything the WHPC should ever feel.Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 19.05.2005 @ 03:07
I republished the entire "Periscope" item here:
And I'm sorry you've missed the news but the source has since recanted, saying it was NOT in an official government report.
Was there desecration? Yes. Who cares? Fanatical muslims who don't need an excuse to riot against America.Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 17.05.2005 @ 13:59
Excuse me but I took both those dingbats to task because they obviously did not read the post.
If you are going to criticize, fine. But at least have the wits to read the article before you insult me.
K. Hale accused me of making fun of the girl in the post. Where? Also in the article I explain why there was a question as to whether or not the story was real. Ignored by Hale.
Similarly Kelsey accuses me of saying it was a hoax. A simple reading of the article would have disabused the dingbat of any such notion. By reading the entire post - which was updated over a two day period - she would have discovered that I took the trouble to email WMAL about the story. That TV station then emailed me back saying the story was not a hoax.
Someone please tell me why I have to use my comment section to explain what any 7 year old should be able to read above?Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 25.10.2005 @ 15:17
When every single reference to a story is taken off the pages of 57 news sites, I believe there is more than ample reason to believe that a story may have been a hoax.
The internet is full of hoaxes and as someone who wrote about Ms. Greenberg, I owed it to my readers to determine whether or not the story was true.
Talk about ignorant...you are reading a story that was researched many months ago by people who care about whether the story was true or whether it was a hoax. You are the beneficiary of that research in that someone other than you tracked down the sources and determined the truth of the matter.
It's ignorant to use 20/20 hindsight to judge me or anyone else who tracked this story to try and solve the mystery of why more than 57 TV stations that ran the story then suddenly pulled every reference to the story off their websites.Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 24.10.2005 @ 16:23
Perhaps if you bothered to read the post, you wouldn't make ridculous comments.
The reason why there was a belief the story was a hoax are outlined in the post.
There is no attempt anywhere in the post to make fun of the girl or her family.
These things you would know if you bothered to read the post. Instead, you made an ad hominem attack with no basis in fact.
...or maybe you didn't understand what you read? IN which case I would recommend a remedial reading course.Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 24.10.2005 @ 12:11
Pages (132) : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131