Comments Posted By narciso
Displaying 11 To 20 Of 32 Comments
SARAH PALIN AND THE ASPIRATIONAL POLITICS OF RESENTMENT
Ambinder started off right, and then veered off the road with the white racial angle. Why exactly do we need such a complex tax code, or illegal immigration, why do we need such an overweaning leviathan of government. So being patriotic and hopeful is resentment, or as Schreiber put it
Comment Posted By narciso On 10.02.2010 @ 12:05
ressentiment.
WHY CONSERVATISM IS DISCONNECTED FROM REALITY
Don't you have that backwards, the media strove to find the dark cloud in every silver lining, if unenployment was low, they looked at the underemployed, or the income differential. every explosion in Iraq was treated like the Tet offensive. Katrina was treated as if Bush had blown up the levees himself. Everytime a terrorist plot was uncovered
Comment Posted By narciso On 13.01.2010 @ 20:57
it was dismissed, and every Gitmo detainee was given the benefit of the doubt.
They want to uproot the whole social order, or haven't you been paying attention Which regulations like the CRA revision that mandated loans to those who couldn't afford them, do immigration amnesties work, see 1987, that's very
arguable, do universal health care mandates work. Does releasing detainees back to the stalking ground, by misreading statutory precedents. You understand that the touchstone of the '92 convention was the Democrats endorsing the LA riots, that makes Buchanan's inflammatory language maybe a little clearer. What is the good, the compromise that we are to make, because if the situation were reversed, they would be just as understandingWhat are you talking about? Democrats endorsed the 92 riots?
Thank you for leaving a comment that proves my point about being totally divorced from reality.
ed.
Comment Posted By narciso On 12.01.2010 @ 14:49
OF AX GRINDING AND SCORE SETTLING
Odd how the policy people, like Schuenenman, and Beigin didn't have a problem with her, neither did the accounts in
Comment Posted By narciso On 11.01.2010 @ 17:57
Walshe and Conroy's book, In fact there are many outright false statements in "Game Change", by someone who wanted to obscure that they had given up the campaign in September of that year,
SARAH PALIN AS THE PIVOT FOR 'NEW' GOP
I've stayed away from this site for a while as well, so the Kilkenny letter was a lie, but the fact that some people believed it was enough. That's the bulk of much of the supposed 'facts' about her. CPAC, from my informal survey was probably more pro Sarah, in the winter, then that poll would indicate. Now one minor point few have noticed is her husband starts the Ironman race, the next day after the conference, so that might be a reason.
Now it's curious the only violence has been seen at Tea Parties has beenthat directed at Gladney by SEIU thugs, yet this is made as an argument, first prompted by Boxer, because of her San Francisco background, the SLA, the Dan White shooting, Jim Jones who wasn't violent in San Francisco, but we know how that turned out
Comment Posted By narciso On 9.01.2010 @ 21:20
'IQ OF A CELERY STALK?' WHY DIDN'T I THINK OF THAT ONE?
Well there is that, but she saw through the Obama mirage, quite clearly. One should also recall that it was not such
Comment Posted By narciso On 23.11.2009 @ 11:22
a sure thing that Reagan would beat Carter even six monthes out. And the likelyhood of Connally or Baker doing it.
The point being, that Taibbi is an extraordinarily jaundiced, some would say resentful figure, who has has proferred lies in the past, not only about Palin, but Romney, McCain, et al. So you would think that Moran would be
Comment Posted By narciso On 22.11.2009 @ 23:18
cautious about that type of 'drive by
analysis'. This suggests certainly nuthouse if not necessarily right wing.Maybe it's the fact that '24 has
gone straight into the dump, that explains this attitude. Now you would think that the complex negotiations
between the state, TransCanada and now
Exxon, would be one of the things that
would detract from the derogatory nature
of the title of this post.
See, one ratifies a detestable column and Taibbi when he is not writing of a 101 uses for a Dead Pope, as he has in the New York Press, occasionally has some good material. Along the lines of Goldman's ties to various bubbles through time. But you haven't seen the statements of Obama admitting that the public option, is a way to single payer.
Or the words of Mark Lloyd or John Holdren, arguing for an explicit redistribution of wealth. It strikes that this premise of resentment is ridiculously off base, unless love of country, support for our troops is resentiment, maybe naivete is the worse
one can attribute to her. She can't really imagine a President who is pursuing policies that retard any likely
future economic growth, that demoralize
our military, alienate our allies, and
hearten our foes. I admit that's kind of an enigma to me, as well.Whereas the current actual president was marinated for at least twenty years in the Marxism of Ayers, the black nationalism of Wright, the critical legal studies marxist analysis of Bell.
Comment Posted By narciso On 22.11.2009 @ 22:00
Everything is Caesar's in his and the
considered opinion of much of his entourage
So you endorse this type of column,
do you Moran,you show no affrontery to someone who lied before about her record, the supposed indictment rumors, from July, were first put forth last October. Her actual recorddoesn't matter to Taibbi, or to you. Than again, neither did Obama's. You want to deny the truth about death panels with the news about breast and cervical cancer testing, with the language giving
discretion to the HHS secretary over vast areas of coverage.All I can say is...HUH?
ed.
Comment Posted By narciso On 22.11.2009 @ 11:45
IS THERE ANY WAY SARAH PALIN CAN RECOVER?
She's a happy warrior who's willing to say what needs to be said; Obama is as inflated as the Hindenberg for no good reason, 17% unemployment,delaying
Comment Posted By narciso On 17.11.2009 @ 21:38
the deployment in Afghanistan, while the Taliban is on the march, proposing a disastrous cap n trade regime; he's either clueless (which is the charitable view,) or malicious
