Comments Posted By deagle
Displaying 61 To 70 Of 101 Comments
ANN COULTER: CONSERVATIVE LOUT
Wow... I feel sorry for you... really.
I don't know where to begin... Mercy, you do live in a strange world....and seem to be religeious as well which is more strange....
Well, for beginners...only the liberal responses were reported by the MSM... Well, now to be accurate, there were a few non-liberal reports (ie. papers) but even those were few a far between. To me, non-liberal means to tell the truth without bias...
I actaully feel a bit sorry for you if you actually believe all that you say. That means that your have fully bought into the MSM and really believe what you have been reading. In that case, I can not disuade you or even try for that matter. You are one of those hardcore believers that will not change your mind regardless of facts....so
Have a good night...wish you well.
Comment Posted By DEagle On 9.06.2006 @ 02:20
Mavent:
Oh, and by the way, what the heck is the Christian argument anyway? I thought we were discussing a valid point of contention that Ann stated - ie Widows taking advantage of thieir situation.
Comment Posted By DEagle On 9.06.2006 @ 02:01
Mavent:
I simply disagree.. I have seen those so called widows on TV and they were almost always spouting a liberal point of view (anti bush). Now to be honest, there was once that I remember that they (one group) did not try to blame Bush, but the majority that I've seen on TV were adamantly anti-bush and pro Democrat. Not I'll admit that I have not read the book (yet) but I have no doubt that most of what she is saying is true (always has been in the past).
I understand what your are saying about some of the widows (have seen them on TV) regarding non-partison positions, but if you follow much of the coverage, you'll see that it is always the liberal side that gets coverage. Now you may believe different, but if you notice, the group that did come out of the "widows" (ie. on TV) were liberal, not exactly a group of conservatives so I do have to wonder... There were a group that were conservative, but they recieved minimal coverage. The MSM tended to cover only the liberal group....so in that instance, Ann was right...
Comment Posted By DEagle On 9.06.2006 @ 01:55
Muffy:
Hey, no problem, rumors are as good a truth anytime...hehe...
Comment Posted By DEagle On 9.06.2006 @ 00:26
democraticjack:
Wow...Those have been beaten to death (and are wrong from your viewpoint) and you ought to know by now that they are losers...especially since you apparently read the internet blogs... Where have you been?
Yes, I do suppose that you live in the past/myth, but that is to be expected if you are to survive. Either read the latest news or don't try to get into the game with old/obsolute Democartic talking points.
Obsolete is a libaral statement of your positions....hehe Try again?
Comment Posted By DEagle On 9.06.2006 @ 00:22
Thanks for the info... I think I will... Regardless of your reasoning. Would give them to my friends, but they already have theres....oh well, I guess that's why they call it a best seller.
Comment Posted By DEagle On 9.06.2006 @ 00:12
Wow... See what you have started here Rick? You have unintentially invited liberal nut(s) into your house with your PC post. Hope you can deal with the consequences...
Comment Posted By DEagle On 9.06.2006 @ 00:02
Muffy:
Mercy, had the liberal world gone mad? Another nice non-statement on here charges. will the liberals every give up on personel persecution and go with factual evidence or is that just a conservative myth...
Comment Posted By DEagle On 8.06.2006 @ 23:58
Mavent:
Wow... The widows that Ann talked about were only a few and believe me, they were not Republicans. If they were, they would not get any voice on the MSM... Who are you kidding anyway?
Comment Posted By DEagle On 8.06.2006 @ 23:38
Yes, Rick;
You took on the conservative Ann and vented your wrath with a bit of compassion. Whew...though that you would never end your righteous tirade...
Well, if it makes you feel better to join the righteous left in condemning the so_righteous right, then congratulations...you succeeded.
The problem is like most overly righteous left (Not you here); you forgot the "content" of the statement while condemning the outrageous statement. One of these days, the right will understand the ploys of the left and stop this nonsense, but not in my lifetime, I'm sure.
Like others, you ignore the significance of the statement and look at the correct (i.e. correct or PC way to present) method to state your position. Oh well, what does anyone in the media expect anyway...
If only 1 in 5 question the antics of the MSM (and we know they are a bit biased) and those that hope to supplant them, this would not happen. I understand the moral underpinnings of such nonsense, but those of supposedly superior intellect ought to know better than to pander to such nonsense.
Yes, I do not have much faith in either the MSM or for that matter, conservative blogs...
Comment Posted By DEagle On 8.06.2006 @ 23:33
