Comments Posted By Susan
Displaying 21 To 30 Of 30 Comments
WELCOME TO THE 2008 PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN
Rob
Do you know who are the Yasin brothers? They are Iraqis who belonged to the Al Queda group which blew up the WTC in 1993. After bombing the WTC in 1993, Rahmad Yasin returned to Baghdad receiving santuary within Saddam's dictatorship graveyard. Not to mention another obtuse oversight by the 9/11 commission's omission of a certain 1999 Maylasian 3 day Al Queda fest in which a certain iraqi 'facilitator' sent by the Iraqi Embassy in Maylasia by the name of Shakir met with at least one 9/11 hihackers and one of the Yasin brothers. Shakir was arrested in Qatar shortly after the 9/11 attacks with a pile of documents containing Al Queda contact information and planning details. He was released and his whereabouts are unknown, as are the whereabouts of the Yasin brothers.
Do you know Ansar al Islam, the Al Queda affiliate who moved into Iraq shortly before the 9/11 attacks? This group set up shop about 25 miles north of Baghdad.
Of course, none can deny the money (most likely obtained from the UN oil for food theft) Saddam lavished upon the families of Islamic-fascist terrorizers known as Hamas and Hezbollah each time a suicide bomber blew up innocent civilians in Israel.
To say that Iraq did not have terrorists in their country before the intervention is a lie which cannot go unnoticed.
Comment Posted By susan On 20.09.2005 @ 10:20
At my age I should know better than to submit BEORE preview. I assume full responsibilty for my impassioned mistakes. I do hope my message is not lost in grammatical errors but Cindy does represent all that feminist muck, not muke, I detest in feminism.
My from perspective Gloria Steinem burned our bras only to leave a legacy of sagging siliconed breasts worn by sobbing cowards crying victimhood. Yes, I am angry. Angry because I wasted a great portion of my life believing in cowards whose only concern, as it turns out, exists simply in the plight of their own narcissistic vaginas while at the very same time demoralized, degradated and humiliated Motherhood and, in general, the female's powerful innate ability to birth and raise even one child.
Women of long days since past each managed to birth and raise what could be qualified as a village yet today's modern women with wealth, power and law supporting her cannot seem to manage birthing and raising one child without the help of, in Hillary Clinton's words, an entire village. The shame in found such degradation.
Comment Posted By susan On 20.09.2005 @ 09:58
Look Rob
I am all for a female President BUT it is going to take much more than feminist rhetoric to supercede the image of an American Governor sobbing helplessly before the camera. As a 21st century advance feminist I demand our female leaders actually show leadership rather than simply speak idle words.The feminist movement from the antiquated 20th century ideology has through it's own acts spent an enormous amount of energy, time and resources believing that victimizing women empowers us yet at the same time expect me as a female to believe in their hollow words. I am now 44 years of age and have been hearing all my life nothing but hollow words from my American Sisterhood which sells weakness for profit while pretending strength is what we women have achieved. All we have achieved over the past three decades are bigger tits and better botox treatments neither of which are useful tools for defending, protecting and securing this country.
I am sick to death of the BS 20th century feminist rhetoric of false feminist empowerment. If she cannot walk the talk then shut the BS feminist rhetoric talk. As a women, it is meaningless to me to hear a 20th century feminist along the lines of a Hillary Clinton speak as if she as the tools to lead when the only thing she offers is false imagery based on 20th century feminist lies.
You see, the women of Afghanistan and the US Military soldiers (both women and men) are my 21st century feminists for they they represent to me a source of strength not seen coming from American 20th century feminism. I find it ironic that American feminist will castrate our male military members by declaring we should bring them home in order to protect them while the same time our own brave female military members are ignored for having stepped up to the plate joining male soldiers in the fight to liberate millions in both Afghaninstan and Iraq.
An hysterical Cindy Sheehan represents all the 20th century feminist muke I detest.
Comment Posted By susan On 20.09.2005 @ 07:01
At one time I considered the possibilty of a female
Comment Posted By susan On 19.09.2005 @ 20:35
president but after Blanco's hysterical breakdown I'm now quite hesitant to elect a female to lead from the most demanding position in the world. All the feminist rhetoric in the world will not convince me and I'm a 'liberated' woman. If a women wants to run for President, including Dr. Rice, she would be more convincing if she were first Governor and prove she can actually take command. The Senate is no place to prove one's ability command the Presidency. People will publically say that a women is capable but when in the privacy of the voting booth they will recall instances of hysterical women sobbing before the public crying how untenable is the situation. Blanco's behavior does nothing to affirm women's abilty to provide strong leadership. I don't care about image, I care about substance and character both of which can never be proven through words alone.
THE WILD, WILD, WILD, WILD, AND WACKY WORLD OF CINDY SHEEHAN
Oh give this hysterical child a lollipop to shut her up.
Comment Posted By susan On 17.09.2005 @ 07:55
The exposure is Liberalism's Collective group-think is rotted to the core with overblown hate, intolerance and political correctness while Collectively having zero thought as to such a concept as personal responsibility. The drones are here in the form of Bushhate.
Comment Posted By susan On 14.09.2005 @ 11:51
Today I wrote a letter to my mayor informing him that he had better perform his duty by securing and protecting his people and for him to take a long, close look at Mayor Nagin and the subsequent disasters created by inept leadership or I will be taking my tax dollars to a city and state with elected leaders who WILL perform their offical duties.
Comment Posted By susan On 5.09.2005 @ 18:49
ABLE DANGER GETS SOME LEGS...MAYBE
Also, National Geographic recently aired a program about the lead-up to 9/11 which makes reference to a 'chart' identifying two 9/11 terrorists in 2000. Maybe the Commsioners and the Pentagon could ask the NG producers how they obtained information of such chart which apparently today does not exist.
Comment Posted By susan On 23.08.2005 @ 09:00
Keep in mind that the transition period in 2000 was delayed several months due to the 2000 election fiasco. Most of the prior adminstration's people were still in place until well into late spring/early summer. I highly doubt the Bush adminstration had either the time or the people in place to review/dissolve the Able Danger program.
Remember Able Danger was a prototype operation and prior to 9/11 the political and social culture in America frowned upon the idea that the government data mines citizens. I do not believe the prior adminstration really wanted anyone to know, including the incoming administration, about such a military program existing.
Able Danger was dissovled not to hide 9/11 (because that had not yet occurred) but because it exposed the premise that the former Clinton adminstration developed data mining programs which operated under the radar, hidden from legal eagles like the ACLU's public scrutiny. Remember too, that ever since the 1993 WTC bombing Islamic terrorism was basically treated as a law enforcement issue, not a military issue and, it is well known that law enforcement did not have available the data mining means to investigate Islamic terrorist cells in America, but the military did.
Comment Posted By susan On 23.08.2005 @ 08:48
C'mon, we all know this is true. We all know that our guys have been doing this - it is even in their training. Don't blame Newsweek for reporting the truth - it will all come out in the wash.
Comment Posted By Susan On 16.05.2005 @ 14:05
