Comments Posted By Robert
Displaying 31 To 40 Of 46 Comments
Two more reasons for optimism for the Bear's future:
Comment Posted By Robert On 7.02.2007 @ 13:05
1. Dusty Dvorak. Oklahoma DL draft from last year, sidelined with injuries all this year. This guy is supposed to be an animal.
2. We have been drafting well lately. This should continue.
Speaking of disrespect.
Fahagie's swipe at Gore showed no respect (nor gave mention) to the job the "liberal MSM" (ha ha, that one kills me) did on him by making up things he said, giving W a pass on his "funny math" claims during the debates, and looking the other way over W's AWOL issues while talking about Gore's attire.
Comment Posted By Robert On 28.12.2006 @ 12:32
CIVIL LIBERTIES HYSTERIA MONGERS CAN BITE ME
We need to trust W.
After all, look at the stellar job he did cleaning up the Middle East.
Comment Posted By Robert On 30.11.2006 @ 15:42
Conspiracy?
Since we have decided as a country that we will refuse to look into any of the problems in Ohio 2004, I'd hardly call that a conspiracy.
No democracy could withstand an investigation into voting irregularities.
That's obvious.
Comment Posted By Robert On 29.08.2006 @ 12:31
CARTER PROVES EXISTENCE OF A MERCIFUL GOD
In the race for worst President of all-time, W whizzed by Clinton, Carter and Reagan like they were all speeding in reverse.
Comment Posted By Robert On 29.08.2006 @ 15:45
Well md's post sure showed you Rick. I guess the nutters are now mainstream (A SD house race is surely telling!) and we should expect them to be sweeping the country (series?) in November. Boy if KOS would just pick every Dem candidate they could certainly win EVERY House seat!
Comment Posted By Robert On 5.08.2006 @ 04:24
IRAQI PRESIDENT: THE "LAST THROES" OF DEMENTIA?
Drewsmom,
Don't like the "cut and run"?
I'm with you, the "stay and die" is much better, especially so since it's not ME staying and dieing.
This war is so easy behind my keyboard and monitor.
Comment Posted By Robert On 3.08.2006 @ 13:35
IAF ADMITS IT WAS WRONG ABOUT QANA
"We will ultimately win because we are better than them."
Platitudes. Empty rhetoric. We will win because we are smarter, stronger and more committed to victory than they are.
Comment Posted By Robert On 2.08.2006 @ 08:15
Being moral is great. It doesn't win you victories. Ask the Poles in 1939.
PLEASE ELIMINATE THE WORD "ELIMINATIONIST"...AND THOSE WHO USE THE TERM
Oh please.
Since your in the business of wanting concrete examples regarding Ricks assertions that "The Left" marches in lockstep why don't you provide some examples of Conservatives poisoning judges or committing murder because Ann Coulter asked them to or joked about it.
Its ironic that so many libs are convinced that Conservatives really wish to kill them or lock them up. When we mock their paranoia with jokes we get the "SEE! SEE!! You really do want to kill us!" or the "You shouldn't joke about killing because somebody somewhere might take you serious and actually kill someone!" Libs are pent up, paranoid sissies. They take offense at the dumbest crap and then go on to disregard the things that actually matter.
Some general examples:
Conservative says: Abortion is the killing of an innocent human life. It is immoral. It is wrong.
Liberal responds: Are you calling me a murderer!!?? How dare you say such a thing that might inspire others to kill me!!
Conservative says: Imprisoning Al Qaeda operatives at Gitmo is important. We won't use it to lock up liberals just yet yuk yuk!
Liberal responds: See, Conservatives want to turn America into a Gulag where they lock up all who disagree with them!!
If you think I'm kidding MD you should actually go out and communicate with some of the paranoid left, especially that which dwells in the nutosphere of liberal land. I have. And they actually believe this stuff.
Comment Posted By Robert On 19.07.2006 @ 03:54
A SMALL DETOUR ON OUR ROAD TO DICTATORSHIP
Rob,
Tough to argue with such a fact filled and reasoned line of thinking as this:
Reagan loved and armed Saddam.
Bush I loved and armed Bin Laden.
Kennedy was a big hero for trying to kill Castro. Republicans would have rather "done business" with him.
Slick Willie was a tough president who went to war against Milosivic out of his hatred for tyranny.Try this Rob.
1. The U.S gave tacit support to Saddam in an effort to undermine Iran, considered a graver threat to the West than Saddam at the time. In effect, Republicans sought to undermine the greater tyrant of the two.
2. The U.S gave support to Afgani's fighting against the Soviet Union, considered a graver threat to the West than Bin Laden and crew at the time. In effect, Republicans sought to undermine the greater tyrant of the two.
3. President Kennedy was nothing like the leftists of today who love Fidel and his dead pet Che Guevarra as icons. Try finding a leftist today who dislikes Fidel or Che or "President" Huggy Chavez. President Kennedy understood the threat of the Soviet Union and its satelites, like many in his party at the time. Try finding one today in the Democrat Party.
4. Holding up Clinton as a tyrants bane is laughable. Milosivik was without a doubt a tyrant, but his removal under the watch of the Clinton administration had far more to do with PR than any deeped seeded hate of tyranny close to Clintons heart. While were on the topic, do you regard Clintons failure to achieve any success in North Korea and the transfer of nuclear technology to the Chi Coms as part of Clintons status as a tyrant fighting warrior?
Better luck next time. Nice doing business with you!
Comment Posted By Robert On 8.07.2006 @ 01:49
