Comments Posted By Rick Moran
Displaying 481 To 490 Of 1317 Comments
And your clinical evidence that Bush is "sociopathic?"
There is none of course. Which makes you an ignorant blowhard.
As for "history tapping Bush on the shoulder" - that's what happens when the people elect a President - something only a paranoid fool would deny at this point.
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 12.01.2007 @ 10:44
Your comment was deleted for being non germane to the post. It couldn't even be described as shallow. It was just ignorant.
You gone.
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 12.01.2007 @ 10:18
You know, I've read some pretty ignorant comments on this site. But that one takes the prize.
The towering straw man you set up in one sentence there is unbelievable. One, of course, has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with the other. It has nothing to do with the post above. It has nothing to do with rational thought.
It is, to put it mildly, bullshit. And if that's the best you can do to contribute to discussion here, you will be banned.
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 12.01.2007 @ 10:17
Your comment was deleted for being non germane to the post.
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 12.01.2007 @ 03:45
WHAT GOES AROUND, COMES AROUND
Just curious here:
Would you have criticized Roosevelt when he pissed of DeGaulle (which was a regular occurence in the lead up to Normandy)? Or when he made Uncle Joe Stalin, another ally, so mad he almost made a separate peace with Hitler? Or when he consistently rebuffed Churchill who wanted to use American troops to maintain the British Empire causing the old imperialist to loudly denounce FDR to his friends?
As I said, I'm curious.
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 12.01.2007 @ 07:37
Jonathan:
See how easy it is to be rational, civil, and add something constructive to the discussion?
I'm proud of you...
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 12.01.2007 @ 05:36
Hick:
Your comment about what "we" believe on this blog was deleted for being so incredibly ignorant that it begged to be struck down.
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 12.01.2007 @ 03:47
Oh for God's sake.
The Iranian takeover of our embassy was not "blowback." It was a clear, unmitigated unconscionable violation of international law.
The fact that you put the onus on us is frankly unbelievable and shows an incredibly warped worldview. What you are saying is that the Iranians had no other way to display their displeasure with our interference except violating every norm of international behavior known to civilized man, shattering international law, beating and torturing our hostages, and ignoring the United Nations.
That's not ignorant - it's so incredibly shallow you make me believe that a child wrote it.
Unbelievably stupid...
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 11.01.2007 @ 13:06
TIME FOR MALIKI TO FILL OUT THE EMPTY SUIT
1. You put an article on my website claiming that Maliki was tied in with the death squads.
2. I said there was no evidence to support it.
3. You said that because Maliki and Jabr served in the governmetn together that this was evidence.
4. I still say it is not evidence that Maliki is behind the death squads just because he and the notorious former Interior minister happen to be in the same government.
You can't change the subject in the middle of the argument. So stop it already. It's useless trying to discuss someone as scatterbrained as you are.
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 12.01.2007 @ 16:54
IT'S STILL GUILT BY ASSOCIATION!
Forget it. You have no evidence because there is no evidence. You can believe what ever you want - like Amr and his fantasies.
But please dont insult people's intelligence by asking them to join you in believing what any rational person rejects.
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 12.01.2007 @ 16:45
