Comments Posted By Rick Moran
Displaying 161 To 170 Of 1317 Comments
ATTACK ON PETREAUS A SURE SIGN OF DESPERATION
The "I told you so" refers to the idea that the surge wouldn't work. It is achieving many of the goals that Petreaus set for it. There is progress being made - measurable progress.
In that respect, you and the left are wrong. And playing into the enemy's hands by pointing to a mass casualty attack - each, single attack - a crowing (actually being glad) that "the surge isn't working" makes you and the terrorists partners.
If you find this something to be proud of, that's pretty pathetic.
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 10.09.2007 @ 17:53
Melanie:
Here was your comment from the other thread:
They should have gotten an actor for the video this time that actually looked like Osama. The desperation of the Administration these days is so pitifully obvious.
I wasn't dissing the idea that the video was faked. I was laughing at your tin foil hat notion that the Administration made it.
It's stupid and silly. And nuts to believe that.
M'kay?
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 10.09.2007 @ 14:48
TOUGH HILL TO CLIMB FOR MY BELOVEDS
Bears play the Seahawks in Seattle this year. With Hasselbach and Alexander healthy, look out Bears!
That San Diego team is fun to watch. I don't think anyone can beat them but themselves this year.
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 9.09.2007 @ 09:29
MALKIN'S CRITICS: APPALLING INCIVILITY
I will brook no hint, intimation, allusion, suggestion, or outright charge that I am in any way, shape, or form beholden to, a lackey for, or otherwise influenced by Michelle Malkin or my position with her blog as it relates to this post.
I have made crystal clear my reasons for writing it. The fact that people can't read English and insist on ascribing false, improper, even sinister motives to me for defending Malkin will bring down the wrath of Rick upon them - uncensored and in their faces.
I disagree with Malkin on many, many issues. We see eye to eye on many more. She didn't hire me because I agree with her and I don't work for her because I'm a huge fan.
We have a business arrangement, period. If some lefty blogger had offered me a position to do similar work - and the blogger in question wasn't a flaming moonbat - I would have seriously considered the proposition.
Malkin's case perfectly - and I mean perfectly - illustrates what I have been writing about the left for nearly three years now; that most of them are a bunch of hypocritical, soulless, whining philistines - wildly illogical, morbidly fascinated with America's faults without any reasonable perspective on our past or present politics, and a mean streak a mile wide.
I would have written this post whether I was employed by Malkin or not for the simple reason I have elucidated many of the points I make in the article time and time again over the years. Along with the very personal affront I feel that Rivera and the left demean and dehumanize all successful women - including my sister - by demeaning Malkin, these are my reasons and motivations for writing it.
Anyone who says or implies differently will hear about it.
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 8.09.2007 @ 07:25
There you go again! People who regularly blog are doubled over in laughter at your total cluelessness!
You recategorize posts - or in this case where about 3500 were "uncategorized" you find a category for them - because about 30-40% of a bloggers visitors come via search engines.
Search engines like Google take keywords from categories - the closer your keyword to what someone using a search engine wants, the higher your ranking hence, more visitors.
Trying to outsmart search engines is an age old game for people who run web sites - including bloggers.
Now that you've made a complete ass of yourself - AGAIN - maybe you want to know something like what direction the sun will set tonight or rise tomorrow morning? (Hint: It's not north or south).
And BTW - sock puppetry is not allowed on this site. If you don't have the guts to choose a username and stick with it, don't bother coming here again.
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 7.09.2007 @ 13:57
How embarrassing to admit to a task apparently inspired by Geraldo having told the truth about a peculiar woman FOX has tapped for some kind of second tier stardom.
I have been recategorizing her posts since the middle of June. Geraldo made his statement on September 1. Are you brain dead as well as being an ignoramous? How is it possible Geraldo "inspired" this task when it has been going on 3 months longer than his threats?
Now, in my universe, that would seem to indicate that your statement that the recategorization project was "inspired" by Geraldo is perhaps the absolutely most hilarious example of ignorance ever exhibited on this site. As for being a paid cheerleader, see my comment above. The only way I could have made clearer that my motives for this post were personal and had little to do with Malkin is if I took out all the words of more than two syllables so that retarded nincompoops like you would have a chance of understanding it.
Of course, that would mean that you would have to actually, you know, READ the post instead of superficially gathering a sense of what I wrote.
Next time, please read what I write so that people won't laugh at you when you comment.
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 7.09.2007 @ 13:24
Malkin doesn't need an article from me to make money on her blog.The idea that any "attention" I might bring to her would increase her earnings is perhaps the most ignorant thing you've ever written on her blog.
I get 2000 hits a day she gets 150,000. Duh.
And who the fuck are you to say I'm a "stooge." I made the reasons for writing about the putrid crap flung in her direction crystal clear- most of it personal and having nothing to do with Malkin.
Or maybe you missed that part. You rarely read anything I write carefully enough to make anything except inane, stupidly sarcastic comments anyway.
Go fuck yourself.
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 7.09.2007 @ 11:49
You are a bigot if you believe gay people all think exactly the same way about issues like gay marriage or hate crime legislation.
There's no other way to describe someone who believes that all blacks, or all asians, or all hispanics, or all gays should believe exactly the same thing.
And if you don't believe that then it simply cannot be hypocritical to disagree with Rogers. That is the point here. Rogers is using his own standards, his own positions on the issues to judge someone else and to ruin someone's life. In short, if you disagree with him politically, you are fair game.
That is wrong. It is dirty, scummy politics and would not have been tolerated a few years ago.
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 4.09.2007 @ 21:24
"YOU VILL DO VUT I SAY AND BE HEALTHY, EH <em>SCHWEINHUND?"</em>
One thing the health fascists fail to mention is that Mark's 106 year old grandmother placed a greater strain on the health care system than an obese smoker who dies at 55.
Someone who lives into their 80's, constantly having health issues even though he doesn't smoke or eat bad foods is where this is headed. We will eventually ration health care based on use, not need. The less you use the system, the longer you live.
The Brits are halfway there already.
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 4.09.2007 @ 21:39
It is not a question of whether it would make people healthier. The left is always weeping about giving up "liberty" (a concept they don't understand) for security. How about giving up liberty for health?
It is not a question of whether I exaggerated a lot in order to make a singular point.
The point is simple, direct, and I wouldn't expect a foreigner to understand it:
John Edwards proposal is an affront to liberty, the essence of which is choice. I don't care if the "penalties" are mild or not. The idea that compulsion of any kind is involved smacks of tyranny.
The left doesn't get it. They gave up on liberty long ago. And foreigners don't understand this concept of liberty quite the way we Americans think about it.
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 3.09.2007 @ 18:22
