Comments Posted By Rick Moran
Displaying 121 To 130 Of 1317 Comments
"WILL NO ONE RID ME OF THIS MEDDLESOME TERRORIST?"
Your comment was deleted because you didn't read the post:
Knowing the crew in the White House and Pentagon, it would not surprise me in the slightest if the incompetence charge turned out to be true.
If you are going to criticize me for something, first read the article (if you are capable of doing so) and then comment intelligently.
I guess that lets you out...
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 26.10.2007 @ 09:32
Gee I don't know. Maybe it's kinda a good idea to, you know, have proof of incompetence before going off like an idiot and saying so.
Since you're a mind reader and can glean what Hunt means when he says "incompetent,' please share.
And then go back to kindergarten and learn how to read.
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 26.10.2007 @ 09:25
Thank you for admitting you're a hypocrite.
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 26.10.2007 @ 08:50
THE RACE TO POLITICIZE TRAGEDY
Terrorists? Sort of like Randi Rhodes accusing Blackwater of starting the fires.
http://dummiefunnies.blogspot.com/2007/10/randi-rhodes-suggests-that-blackwater.html
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 27.10.2007 @ 06:45
KILL THE MESSENGER! OR IS THE MESSAGE ALREADY DEAD?
You make the government small by cutting programs. Conservatives used to do that back in the old days.
I rest my case.
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 24.10.2007 @ 12:03
Doug:
Good point about social cons "distorting" the conservative movement.
From what I've read, people like Hayek et. al. see conservatism and "values" in a quite a different light than the anti-abortion/anti-gay marriage crowd.
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 24.10.2007 @ 09:22
THE DEVIL WENT DOWN TO COLUMBIA
#22
I don't cotton to being compared to Nazis.
You're banned.
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 24.09.2007 @ 12:01
One more time:
The left applies a different moral standard to judge the US then they do Iran. And that fits this definition given by Wikpedia:
In philosophy, moral relativism is the position that moral or ethical propositions do not reflect objective and/or universal moral truths, but instead make claims relative to social, cultural, historical or personal circumstances. Moral relativists hold that no universal standard exists by which to assess an ethical proposition's truth; it is the opposite of moral absolutism. Relativistic positions often see moral values as applicable only within certain cultural boundaries or in the context of individual preferences...
By judging Iran and the US differently, the left sees the moral values of the two sides applicable only in the "context of individual preferences." They see no objective moral truth that would allow them to judge the two sides equally.
It is not "hypocrisy" - it is a textbook example of relativism.
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 24.09.2007 @ 10:11
ZM:
Your comments were deleted because they were non germane to the posts they were made at.
Plus, the first comment I deleted was exactly the same comment you left on another thread. We don't do duplicates.
Finally, you are being banned because of your insulting language toward me.
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 24.09.2007 @ 06:38
The relativism is that the left is more concerned that joining any demonstration against Iran would help their political enemies than they are the crimes of Iran against human rights.
What is so difficult to understand there? The left would rather their political enemies lose than Iran lose in the PR battle. That is selective morality, i.e. relativism.
Duh.
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 23.09.2007 @ 16:45
