Comments Posted By Rick Moran
Displaying 1201 To 1210 Of 1317 Comments
You are ignorant of the meaning of "Neocon." You don't have a clue. You use it for shorthand to describe an set of principles you disagree with.
If you knew what it meant you'd know I'm the farthest thing from a Neocon you can get. I'm not even in the ballpark.
As for the Niger President's comments, try the Butler Review or the SSCI report. He didn't sell the yellowcake because it would have been in violation of the sanctions. But that doesn't obviate the fact that the Iraq "businessmen" didn't inquire after the mineral.
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 27.07.2005 @ 12:27
I would have deleted it but I'm already in enough trouble with these lefties who don't think that calling you a nazi is insulting. They whine like 12 year old girls when I delete their insulting, meaningless, off topic comments.
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 27.07.2005 @ 11:47
Get your own damn blog if you're going to write that much. Your comment is a waste of my bandwidth.
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 27.07.2005 @ 10:55
THEY'RE APPEASERS NOT TRAITORS
While I agree with you, it's been my belief all along that we need the left in order to win this war.
Think of the left during World War II and much of the cold war. They supplied an intellectual framework to defeat both fascism and communism. If they had behaved that way during WW II and the early stages of the cold war, we wouldn't have won either.
Perhaps it will come to isolation for the appeasers. The American people will make that decision at the ballot box.
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 22.07.2005 @ 15:04
LIBBY AND ROVE COLLABORATED ON WILSON RESPONSE: WOOT!
Your comment is not being deleted for what it says. Your comment has been deleted for your personal attack.
I'm sick of it and I'm not putting up with it any longer.
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 22.07.2005 @ 11:45
CONFRIMATION STRATEGIES REFLECT PARTISAN REALITIES
And I checked Specter's website this morning before posting. Not a peep yet. I wonder if he's trying to gauge how much Democratic support the nominee has before speaking.
That would be typical.
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 20.07.2005 @ 09:14
Agreed on all counts, Fritz.
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 20.07.2005 @ 09:12
You're wrong George. The piece is wildly original and you're just jealous because the two working brain cells in your head could never have come up with anything so brilliant.
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 31.10.2005 @ 21:01
When even the NEW YORK TIMES publishes a story saying that Rove didn't committ a crime, one has to ask what planet you came from and can I have a toke off of whatever you're smoking?
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 12.07.2005 @ 11:07
ROVE SCANDAL: LOTS OF SIZZLE, NOT MUCH STEAK
AJ:
In all political scandals, the truth never matters it's perception that counts. How else could Clinton have gotten away with perjury and obstruction? Everyone perceived the scandal was about sex.
Here, the perception will be revenge by Rove for Wilson's treachery. It really won't matter what the truth is because that's the way the media will spin it. Rove's survival will depend on how long the feeding frenzy lasts. If it blows over in a week, he's safe. But if the drip, drip, drip of information keeps coming out - as is usually the case in these scandals - then Rove will be gone in a month - providing Bush lets him go.
Comment Posted By Rick Moran On 11.07.2005 @ 12:13
