Comments Posted By Mark
Displaying 51 To 60 Of 94 Comments
MALKIN'S CRITICS: APPALLING INCIVILITY
I agree with you that the left's nauseating and racist attacks on Michelle Malkin are far beyond the pale (and by no means does she deserve them), but Malkin does conservatives no favors with the kind of rhetorical bomb-throwing she regularly engages in. She really jumped the shark when she wrote that disgusting book defending the internment. Sorry, but I have a hard time drumming up any sympathy for her and I actually wish she would stay off my side.
Comment Posted By Mark On 6.09.2007 @ 20:00
MY TOP TEN MOVIE LINES OF ALL TIME
"I'm shocked!, shocked! that there's gambling going on."
Claude Rains - Casablanca"You a bounty hunter?" (Answer)A man's got to do something for a living.
"Dying, ain't much of a living."
Clint Eastwood - The outlaw Josey Wales"I think someone got in there before Rock."
Kirk Douglas - To Rock Torrey's son - In Harms WayA man's got to know his limitations
Comment Posted By Mark On 19.08.2007 @ 08:11
Clint Eastwood
A SHORT POST ABOUT GRASPING AT STRAWS
Rick,
Respect you to death but this can be won and by won I mean a self sustained Iraq that isn't an enemy or sponsor of terrorism as the previous regime.We are on the way there and it's not been easy or pretty and won't be for a long time. Vigilance.
Comment Posted By Mark On 30.07.2007 @ 14:49
Interesting digging. Wonder what really made them release that stuff now.
Hopefully it doesn't take 30 more years to find out about moles the moles that penetrated the FBI and CIA and the dirt on Saddam that hasn't come out yet.
Comment Posted By Mark On 22.06.2007 @ 14:03
So long, and thanks for all the fish.
I've enjoyed your posts, but not enough to follow elsewhere absent more compelling content.
Comment Posted By Mark On 9.06.2007 @ 11:53
NEW CABINET LEVEL DEPARTMENTS CONTEMPLATED BY DEMS
Absolutely asinine idea. Of course the Democrats are for it.
Comment Posted By Mark On 16.04.2007 @ 00:40
O'REILLY AND GERALDO LOSE IT ON AIR
If Alberto Gonzales' grandparents had been repatriated after entering the US illegaly the DOJ scandal would not have happened.
Comment Posted By Mark On 8.04.2007 @ 16:53
GOODBYE TO ALL THAT: BOLTON ERA AT UN IS OVER
Bolton will surely be missed.
If anyone is interested I just finished my interview with Tommy Franks #2 on what he knew about Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda while planning for the invasion. He mentioned some NEW intelligence on the link between the two. Solid intelligence yet to be seen.
3-Star General reveals additional details of former regime's ties to terror (al Qaeda)
Comment Posted By Mark On 5.12.2006 @ 01:02
http://regimeofterror.com/archives/2006/09/3star_general_reveals_addition/
What year is it? Why is it so in style to tolerate evil and blast people who are trying to take evil on?
I don't get it.
In other Middle East news...
What does Congressman-elect Chris Carney (D-Pennsylvania) know about Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda?
"Newly elected Pennsylvania Congressman, Democrat Chris Carney, a former Senior Terrorism and Intelligence Advisor at the Pentagon, has recently been quoted in a number of publications discussing his knowledge of and role in prewar Iraq intelligence, particularly on the issue Saddam Hussein's links to al Qaeda. His views on the subject are a stark contrast to many in his party, particularly Senator Carl Levin, who has long expressed his belief that any link between Saddam Hussein's regime and al Qaeda was a manufacture of the Bush administration. Carney's comments and experience on the issue may even put him in the cross-hairs of Sen. Levin's reported investigation into the matter in the coming months. What did Congressman Carney say? What does he know?"
more here.. http://regimeofterror.com/archives/2006/12/what_does_congressman_elect_ch/
Comment Posted By Mark On 4.12.2006 @ 13:13
CIVIL LIBERTIES HYSTERIA MONGERS CAN BITE ME
could you please explain how warrantlessly recording phone calls for any purpose is not a violation of the constitution?
Comment Posted By Mark On 29.11.2006 @ 22:36
or are you forgetting about the first and especially fourth amendments?
along with the constitution it is also a violation of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
this has been decided in numerous court cases.
specifically: ACLU v. NSA
I don't know how republicans could be in support of something like this.
republicans are supposedly the party of small government and less government interference.
please explain this to me.
I'm sure your also for the suspension of habeas corpus to our war-time prisoners.
and if this doesn't violate the constitution then what does?
my email is mark.szoke@gmail.com
or maybe you could just post another pretensious rant about this comment.
