Comments Posted By FAP
Displaying 1 To 5 Of 5 Comments
Wow Noelie. Way to have an unbiased view.
"densely populated areas have not been allowed a reign of terror over the hard working rural dwellers"
Call back when you get a clue.
Comment Posted By FAP On 29.08.2006 @ 13:04
Rick and I see your point. I'm not saying the current EC system is not a valid one.
I am saying it's not a fair one as it allocates different value to different voters based solely on their addresses.
Comment Posted By FAP On 29.08.2006 @ 12:23
The last paragraph should read.
Under a “one man one vote†system the Wyoming voter would be still be more valuable than a republican voter in New York [i]UNDER THE CURRENT SYSTEM[/i].
Comment Posted By FAP On 29.08.2006 @ 12:04
The current EC give more weight to votes cast in small staes. In effect each of those voters have super votes. The current system also diminishes the value of votes cast in large states.
Under a "one man one vote" system the Wyoming voter would be still be more valuable than a republican voter in New York.
Comment Posted By FAP On 29.08.2006 @ 12:01
The Electoral College “favors†no one at the moment.
Christopher's 11:12 am post shows this to be demonstrably false.
Comment Posted By FAP On 29.08.2006 @ 11:27
