Comments Posted By Denny
Displaying 1 To 9 Of 9 Comments
THE LEFT TURNS ON THEIR OWN CREATION
Rick,
I can't seem to get your contact form to work, so I will correspond with you here. Hopefully, you won't mind.
My previous site called, 'For Your Conservative Pleasure' is no longer running and has been shut down. I have a new blog called, 'New Republican Party Blog.'
I do want to thank you for putting my previous site up on your site, even though I was brand-new. I do appreciate that fact.
In case you are interested,
http://777denny.wordpress.com/
Thanks again for believing in me.
Denny
Comment Posted By Denny On 19.04.2008 @ 00:22
I have a whole bunch of Obama's lies compiled. And we thought the Clintons' lies were bad.
http://777denny.wordpress.com/2008/04/05/baracks-hypocrisy-on-iraq-energy-and-the-politics-of-personal-destruction/
This Barack fellow is even scarier than the Clinton, in my opinion.
Comment Posted By Denny On 7.04.2008 @ 03:56
Speaking of Obama and deception...Would your “church,” if you fellowship with one, put on it’s bulletin board hateful articles from the anti-semitic, terrorist group Hamas? Barack Obama’s CURRENT church, Trinity United Church of Christ, did just that.
We just found out in the last 48 hours that Wright, while giving a eulogy in 2007, said that “(Jesus’) enemies had their opinion about Him… The Italians for the most part looked down their garlic noses at the Galileans.”
Now comes a report by NBC News that while Wright was in charge at Obama’s CURRENT church, reprinted anti-Israel writings, including one column by none other than Hamas leader, Mousa Abu Marzook, appeared on the bulletin board there.
The column by the Hamas leader, Mousa Abu Marzook, asked: “Why should any Palestinian recognise the monstrous crimes carried out by Israel’s founders and continued by its deformed modern apartheid state?”
The question becomes one of judgment, character, integrity, honesty and intelligence.
If I were to believe Obama’s defense that he didn’t, and still doesn’t, know what was, and still is, going on at his church for 20 years, then, in my opinion, he must not be very observant nor intelligent, and does not possess sensible judgement. Therefore he cannot be qualified to be the POTUS, in my opinion. If I do NOT believe Obama, then his integrity, character and honesty is woefully insufficient to be the POTUS, in my opinion.
Obama went to Harvard Law School (they don’t let just anybody in), where he became the first African-American president of the prestigious Harvard Law Review. He graduated magna cum laude in 1991. Now do you think he is NOT aware of what his church and ex-pastor are all about? Be AFRAID! Be VERY AFRAID!
Barack Obama’s political FRAUD against the American People continues…
Read the rest of this article here...http://777denny.wordpress.com/2008/03/28/barack-obama-reverend-wright-trinity-united-church-of-christ-and-hamas/
Comment Posted By Denny On 28.03.2008 @ 12:56
After hearing more about this bill I am now OPPOSED to it.
The initial reports that I heard about those eligible to received the Z Visas were incorrect along with how long an illegal alien had to be in the country to get one. There are other provisions of this bill that are troubling, too.
NO, NO, NO!
Comment Posted By Denny On 18.05.2007 @ 17:48
After initially seeing the main points of this bill, I would be inclined to support it.
The bill does not lead automatically to citizenship, only applies to those that have been here for 5 years or more, for the first time puts education level ahead of familial ties for consideration for green cards, requires those seeking green cards or citizenship to RETURN (heads of households) to their original countries to apply for LEGAL entrance into the U.S. and puts border security FIRST with “triggers†that must be met and signed off by homeland security in order for other provisions of the bill to be enacted. But, I will wait until a final bill has been crafted on deciding whether or not I will support it.
One thing to consider is that in all practicality because the federal government, especially under the Bush Administration, has abdigated it's responsiblility on immigration enforcement and reform and created the immigration crises we all face, it would be a HUGE mistake to oppose a bill that has so many good aspects to it. I did not think it would contain so many elements I could support.
The reality is that there isn't a workable solution that would peacefully cause even a majority of the 12 million to 20 million illegal aliens to go back home and stay there, especially without a MAJOR backlash against the Republican party that could last a generation or more of DEFEAT for our party.
Sometimes we can only get part of what we want or face consequences that bode DISASTER for our other causes and concerns.
If we handle this correctly, we could win all around with the immigration debate behind us while we focus on winning the Congress, Senate and presidency in 2008.
Remember that I was willing to split from the party on this issue alone, since the original Senate bill called for approximately 100,000,000 new legal immigrants projected to come in on a familial basis in the next twenty years or so. Now we have a point system that for the first time favors skills, instead of familial ties, when issuing green cards or citizenship.
Georgia Republican Johnny Isakson opposed last years' Senate 'amnesty' bill but supports this one because the bill has to have:
a)18,000 border patrol agents
b)370 miles of border fence constructed
c)27,500 detention beds in operation
d)An employment verification system in placeAll these have to be certified by Homeland security (Bush won't be there) BEFORE the "Z Visa" or the "Y Visa" programs can begin.
Please wait until a final bill is achieved before torpedoing it.
Please?
Comment Posted By Denny On 17.05.2007 @ 20:28
O'REILLY AND GERALDO LOSE IT ON AIR
Well said, Arfinator.
I do believe that through your satire to show the insanity of open border anarchism, you showed us some things that could become frighteningly prophetic if we don't get informed, enraged and ACT!
Go Mitt Go!
Comment Posted By Denny On 11.04.2007 @ 01:53
If an illegal alien were to come to America and kill one American, that's a tragedy.
If MILLIONS of invading illegal aliens come here to soak off of our welfare, commit identity theft, cause whole sectors of our economy to become pay and benefit depressed by cheap labor so Americans become increasingly disinterested in these sectors, cause huge amounts of environmental damage, cause the closings of score of hospitals and emergency rooms across the nation, cause overcrowding at scores of schools around the country, cause overcrowding in jails and prisons across the U.S., funnel untold millions of dollars worth of hard drugs into the U.S., and want to form something called Aztlan in the same areas where the U.S. gained land from Mexico in the war we had with them, then we have a spectacular national crises on our hands.
It seems as though enforcing the LAW is not good for the Bushites, who want cheap labor for their multinational big business interests who back them. Their vision for America is now being put into place at the foundational level through the creation of a new political configuration called the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP). It will broaden and deepen the three nations through the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in dramatic ways.
If we actually enforced the law and had all illegal immigrants return to their original countries to wait in line and apply for LEGAL enterence into the United States, we would undermine the whole reason why they come here: once they break the law and are inside the U.S., they are immune from immigration laws and are able to recieve vast amounts of benefits.
Go Mitt Go!
Comment Posted By Denny On 9.04.2007 @ 02:50
Congradulations Rick. May your "15 minutes of fame" last many years more than that.
Comment Posted By Denny On 16.10.2006 @ 04:38
AN UNSCHOLARLY, NON-LAWYERLY OPINION ON THE NSA DECISION
I beleive that the judge that handed down the ruling showed her prejudiced PC hand. Her penned reasoning seems to grab for anything to try and justify her rediculous ruling. Even some liberals who disagree with the terorist surveillance program say she did not rule on the merits of case. It is "chilling" to know we have judges who render decisions based upon their biases who can put ALL Americans more at risk of Islamofascist terrorism!
Comment Posted By Denny On 20.08.2006 @ 05:20
Denny
