Comments Posted By kray
Displaying 1 To 3 Of 3 Comments
WILL WE MAKE HEZBALLAH ANOTHER 'PARTNER FOR PEACE?'
Perhaps I wasn't clear enough.
I didn't suggest the evidence of Iranian involvement in Lebanon was unclear. I questioned how it was relevant, considering that the same article contains a completely BS fantasy scenario devoid of any fact or even basic informed opinon.The US *did* land on the moon. This is not evidence to suggest they've landed on Venus too. It is however the reason I'd be citing someone else come time for the moon landing anniversary. Yhe many, varied not-liars who could also recount a historical event without discrediting themselves.
Comment Posted By kray On 3.11.2009 @ 06:30
"The French, who were hit on the same day as our Marine barracks, are totally convinced of the provenance of the attacks. It was a Hez op, planned in Tehran, with logistical support from Syria, carried out by Pali suicide bombers. They have the Hez planners cold on intercepts in ordering the attacks to go forward.
It’s as solid as any evidence we have that al-Qaeda carried out 9/11.
ed."
Right. Now all you need is some evidence that 1980s Lebanon is in future-tense Afghanistan. Seriously, read what is written.
Comment Posted By kray On 3.11.2009 @ 06:20
"The evidence is pretty solid."
Is this relevant? Rubin goes on to claim in the same article that Iran is attempting to sponsor the same kind of attacks in Afghanistan. A claim supported by the same amount of evidence/logic that would suggest I am too. Albeit that I haven't been supporting NATO strategy to the tune that Iran has.
The French, who were hit on the same day as our Marine barracks, are totally convinced of the provenance of the attacks. It was a Hez op, planned in Tehran, with logistical support from Syria, carried out by Pali suicide bombers. They have the Hez planners cold on intercepts in ordering the attacks to go forward.
It's as solid as any evidence we have that al-Qaeda carried out 9/11.
ed.
Comment Posted By kray On 25.10.2009 @ 16:10
