Comments Posted By ken
Displaying 11 To 20 Of 25 Comments
IF ELECTED, OBAMA WILL BE MY PRESIDENT
Well, it appears our Computer Commando Proud Librul has advanced to the rear.
Comment Posted By Ken On 14.10.2008 @ 20:30
Rick Moran:
Another question: will Obama still be YOUR President when he abrogates the First and Second Amendments, without state ratification?
Comment Posted By Ken On 14.10.2008 @ 20:27
Proud Librul:
Where is this steamroller that's going to squash us? Supposing Obama wins, you've still got close to 50% opposed to him. Are you saying that we will no longer be here after he wins? If that's the case, can I assume that you'll take your part in the Glorious Extermination? More likely you'll be sipping your latte and letting the poor white trash of the ATF and similar organizations put their lives on the line, while you safely hide behind your computer like a true "librul" coward.
Comment Posted By Ken On 14.10.2008 @ 20:05
Suzanne:
In what weird world do you think we'll respect the fact that you're rich? As a right-winger, I know full well--as did the founding fathers--that the idle rich are as parasitical as the idle poor. Jefferson, and even his brilliant Secretary of the Treasury Gallatin (no ivory-tower idealist) knew full well that speculators are a drain on society. It is only the blue-collar types, who till the soil and shape metal, who are productive. You fit well into the Porn Party.
Comment Posted By Ken On 14.10.2008 @ 20:00
Rick Moran:
Let's take a hypothetical. The US gets into an all-out war with Russia and Iran. After initial American successes, Russia and Iran win and even eventually invade America, defeating the US military on US soil.
Rather than take excessive losses overrunning and occupying America, the Russia/Iran alliance negotiates a treaty:
1. The Vice-President of the US will resign.
2. The President will appoint the head of CAIR as his Vice-President. (Assume the head of CAIR was born in the US. If not, assume some similar individual, or perhaps the head of the American Communist Party).
3. The Senate, per the treaty, will confirm the appointment.
4. The President will resign, leaving Mohammed Hussein al-Bakr President of the US.
In fact, a better case can be made for the legitimacy of President al-Bakr than for Obama, since he didn't rely on phony votes. Rather, he benefitted from a perfectly legal set of acts:
It is perfectly legal for Russia and Iran to make war on the US.
It is perfectly legal for the President, with Congress's approval, to make a peace treaty, even a disadvantageous one.
It is perfectly legal for the VP to resign.
It is perfectly legal for the President to nominate any native born American, except William Clinton and George W. Bush, as Vice President.
It is perfectly legal for the President to resign.
Furthermore, this may well be the Will of the People by this time. Remember, we've lost maybe 5 million people getting our asses kicked, and people probably want Change.
Keep in mind that President al-Bakr will almost certainly rule as a puppet for a brutal Iranian occupier.
Will you Support Our Legitimate President al-Bakr?
Because you see, Rick, hard-core Palinites like me regard Obama as indistinguishable from "al-Bakr." We don't accept a Communist president who seized power by registering fake voters and getting George Soros to create an economic crisis just when he was about to lose. We don't accept a Communist monster whose base supporters support the murder of the opposing VP candidates disabled infant son. We not only reject the legitimacy of Obama as President, we reject the evil, cowardly, perverted, non-productive, parasitical TARGETS who make up his demonic supporters.
If the Communist wins, the war is on. Literally. And we will win, because we have the guns and are veterans, where all they've ever done is sip latte and watch rape porn.
Comment Posted By Ken On 14.10.2008 @ 19:53
Rick wrote: "You sound exactly like the No-Nothings of the 1850’s who feared the Irish because they were “papists” and thought they would turn America into a Catholic country."
That is sort of a simplified analysis.
As an Irish-American myself, I see nothing wrong with US citizens exercising their democratic rights to determine what their country will morph into. The existing citizens of the USA in the 1850's had that right, as we do too today.
Today, Catholics and Jews are at the forefront of the open borders lobby and nobody denies this. Most Americans are against their ideological positions on it.
What should matter is what voters want, not elites.
Comment Posted By Ken On 11.09.2008 @ 15:36
OLBERMANN AND MATTHEWS OUT AS MSNBC ANCHORS
Did anyone see the awesome youtube of Pat Buchanan totally taking Matthews to task?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3fADpN5t1RI
Go Pat go!!
Comment Posted By Ken On 11.09.2008 @ 15:44
A LIBERAL MANIFESTO AND OTHER HALLOWEEN FRIGHTS
"...then they will almost certainly be returned to the political oblivion to which they have been banished these many years."
Unless they sieze power first, of course.
Comment Posted By Ken On 30.10.2006 @ 12:50
FOLEY MATTER PROVES REPUBLICANS SUPPORT PERVERTS
Man.
You wicked cwazy.
Comment Posted By Ken On 30.09.2006 @ 18:01
LOUDER PLEASE...THE CRICKETS ARE CHIRPING
Gang of One.....flame wars do all kinds of nasty stuff. I've seen as bad and worse than this over the years. You are welcome to your irrational, emotional assessment. It's immature, but understandable given Deb's comments. It is, of course, that immaturity which allows the rabble rousers to blow this thing into a great big deal.
Comment Posted By Ken On 9.07.2006 @ 19:34
