Comments Posted By jharp
Displaying 11 To 20 Of 44 Comments
How's that make you guys feel about your past history of wanting to bomb Iran?
It's unbelievably tragic what happened and it would be unbelievably tragic for us to bomb them.
Please keep that in your mind.
Which "you guys" are you talking about? Educate yourself about this site ninny. I've been against bombing Iran for 4 years.
How's that make you feel - to be a robotic idiot who mouths talking points?
ed.
Comment Posted By jharp On 22.06.2009 @ 20:47
President Obama has been brilliant in foreign policy.
It is so refreshing to see our President use a thoughtful approach after the moron Bush used to stand up and threaten our adversaries and utter the idiotic claim "they hate us for our freedom".
Thank you President Obama. Keep up the good work.
A man with an IQ of 117 is not a moron. And you exaggerate how Bush "threatened" our adversaries. Whether they hate us for our freedom is a matter of opinion and depends on who you are referring to.
In short, you are a boring, exaggerating, ignorant, spouter of talking points. Since you cannot be any more original than that, you are hereby banned from commenting.
ed.
Comment Posted By jharp On 19.06.2009 @ 13:52
THE CHICAGO WAY TO DEAL WITH NOSY IG'S
aoibhneas Said:
4:21 pmgotta love the cognitive dissonance emanating from the Obama- can -never -do -any- wrong brown nosers like j harpo.
You, aoibhneas, are a typical wingnut jackass. Just who has insinuated that Obama "can never do any wrong"?
Or made any comment alluding to such?
Go jump in the lake.
Comment Posted By jharp On 18.06.2009 @ 21:29
Another fake scandal from the right wing nuts.
I'd honestly feel sorry for you pathetic souls if your group hadn't done so much damage to the country.
As it is I am enjoying watching you make fools of yourselves.
Comment Posted By jharp On 18.06.2009 @ 15:29
DEALERGATE: STATISTICAL COINCIDENCE OR POLITICAL BIAS? (IMPORTANT UPDATE BELOW)
"Finally, Chrysler replies to this story, a day late and a dollar short. I’m still not clear on how the master list of closings was made or who finalized it, but Chrysler has been eager to deep-six a large share of its dealers for years, and this crisis is the perfect excuse to do so at little cost to them. That could explain their reluctance to reply to the story previously, as one does not bring attention to ones self when being presented a politically sensitive gift."
Surabaya Stew Said:
12:46 pmA day late and a dollar short? You're kidding me, right? Since when does it become necessary to respond to completely unfounded and fabricated BS.
They were allowed to deep six the dealers because of bankruptcy. That was some clever plan they hatched. All they needed to do was give up control of the company and wipe out the shareholders for this "gift".
Good grief. You wingnuts just don't think.
Comment Posted By jharp On 29.05.2009 @ 13:02
"Anyone who says this was not an issue worth looking into is politically naive and probably a partisan hack to boot. Of course the idea of politically motivated dealer closings was a possibility - especially with the bunch of arrogant cutthroats Obama has assembled in the auto task force. It would have been irresponsible not to check into this possibility."
No one said it wasn't worth looking into. The detractors point was that there was no evidence to support the claim.
By all means investigate away. But wait to publish a conclusion until you have the data to support it.
Comment Posted By jharp On 29.05.2009 @ 12:43
"Moving forward a few months, where are the jobs? Well here are a whole lot of jobs. Self producing ones that were not costing the government or Chrysler one red cent. These people were taxpayers. Now they will soon be unemployed. And not justtem either, for every dealership bought supplies from other companies. Many were located in smaller, less populated areas whose surrounding economies needed their valuable presence."
cdor Said:
Get rid of the crack pipe. It is doing you great harm.
Comment Posted By jharp On 29.05.2009 @ 00:15
I'm disappointed in you Rick.
I had you pegged as a reasonable wingnut.
No longer. This is the most idiotic non story I have seen in awhile.
There is not one shred of evidence to support this ludicrous claim.
Comment Posted By jharp On 28.05.2009 @ 11:22
NOT A MISPRINT: OBAMA SEEKS CUTS OF 100 <em>MILLION</em> TO CURB DEFICIT
"Do you even know what a wiretap is? As opposed to a pen register or a trap and trace?
Yes. I also know that you used to require a warrant as per the 4th amendment.
"when and where was anyone ever accused of “warrantless wiretapping” except by demagogues and media shills?"
The Democratic-controlled Senate handed President Bush a major political victory on Wednesday, July 9, by voting to derail lawsuits against telecommunications companies that unlawfully opened their networks to the National Security Agency.
But no. There were no unlawful wiretaps in wingnuttia.
Comment Posted By jharp On 20.04.2009 @ 16:23
"Obama thinking this makes him look like a serious deficit hawk"
So now you can tell what Obama is thinking.
Or are you just another wingnut making shit up?Obama cut a $100 million in waste. That's all there is to it. And only God knows why anyone would object to it.
Comment Posted By jharp On 20.04.2009 @ 16:19
