Comments Posted By deagle
Displaying 91 To 100 Of 101 Comments
Thanks Jim,
Very nice reply...
As usual (at least with Rob), I give up on disucssions with the left. Their logic seems to be out of my reach.
Comment Posted By DEagle On 15.09.2005 @ 01:11
Make that to Rob, sorry Liz...
Comment Posted By DEagle On 15.09.2005 @ 00:09
Liz,
It's actually very simple and straight forward. Drop the spin, name calling, etc. and talk like an adult (facts please) and you can engage in an enlightning conversation with the other side. As long as the left engages in emotion rather than facts, the "yelling" will continue.
Comment Posted By DEagle On 15.09.2005 @ 00:07
THE ABSOLUTELY, POSITIVELY, VERY, VERY, LAST THING I HAVE TO SAY ABOUT ID AND EVOLUTION
Cap'n Wolff Larsen,
That was a very impressive post! Thank you for bringing actual facts to the discussion. Emotion tends to rule this discussion (for reasons that will be left unsaid), hmmm...
Comment Posted By DEagle On 4.08.2005 @ 21:41
PlameGame...
Comment Posted By deagle On 16.07.2005 @ 12:38
THE CIA VS. THE WHITE HOUSE AND THE POLITICS OF WAR
Miller protecting Rove, I think not. I believe that the outcome will be more of a journalist protecting a journalist/leftist CIA agent who outed Plame to get back at the administration... I guess we'll see as the evidence unfolds...waiting patiently...
My guess is not only will Rove survive, but he will continue to be a problem for the left wing media. heh...
Comment Posted By deagle On 13.07.2005 @ 21:30
Sorry, the above comment may not belong here... but our beginning is much more important than the Civil War in my opinion.
Comment Posted By deagle On 4.07.2005 @ 22:22
Watched the battle for Trenton (History Channel - Washington) and it brought tears to my eyes. Wish I had been there... Damn...
Comment Posted By deagle On 4.07.2005 @ 22:14
IS INTIMIDATION OF THE JUDICIARY THE ANSWER?
Sorry, you are right regarding the differences but I still do not agree that using the laws as passed against the individual passing the law as intimidation. But then, I guess all laws can be intimidating. I apologize for making the previous post personal rather than an argument for the definition of intimidation. A good reason why I should stick to reading rather than posting…
Comment Posted By deagle On 28.06.2005 @ 21:34
By your reasoning on this, a million protesters marching against this latest affront to the constitution would be intimidation, since they would in effect asking for a change to the law.
Comment Posted By deagle On 28.06.2005 @ 21:07
