Comments Posted By Tom
Displaying 81 To 90 Of 109 Comments
THE DEMONS ARE STIRRING...THE CANDLE IS GUTTERING
'Yes, it is a mutation: a mutation that has been identified in their genes and which is being studied in the hopes that it could help us cure osteoperosis'
so everything is a mutation now? kind of like Andre the giant was a 'mutation'....now with this 'mutation' what do we end up with? a bone, and thats 'evolution'...do you ever step back and realize how ridiculous this sounds? what isn't evolution?
'No, in fact. The basic requirements for evolution to be true are, in fact, very exacting, to the point where imagining something that would disprove something like common descent would in fact be quite easy to do. It’s just that, in practice, we never come across anything like that.'
then you ignore history. lets see the universe used to be thought of as eternal, which would give time for anything to happen, but now it had a start, which was thought to be a body blow to evolution, but NO, nothing is, and nothing can ever be because of how you interpret what you see. I look at the immense complexity of a cell and see the hand of God, you see 'chance' and this mysterious, unmeasurable, ARBITRARY, but all-powerful, force of 'evolution'.
'Whatever. You can say this stuff. But you can’t support it or justify it. Anyone can make stupid accusations.'
MY THOUGHTS EXACTLY!!!
'Welcome what? If you want to teach something in a basic science class, then it had better be a well supported scientific theory. You don’t get to just toss in any old nonsense because you happen to believe it.'
you do if its evolution.
'It’s a process, a logical outgrowth of some basic conditions like a descending heredity with variation and an observed process in nature.'
a 'process' oh yeah that explains everything!! HAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
'Nothing says that we have to be nice to people that argue dishonestly and out of a careless ignorance. Once we’ve easily refuted your litany of bad arguments, we are perfectly free to characterize what the use of those arguments says about you.'
no one would ever accuse darwinists of having an 'evolved' sense of etiquette!!!
we've seen the results of your 'darwinist' society, in Auschwitz and the Gulag.....
Comment Posted By tom On 12.08.2006 @ 23:01
'I’ve run across more than one unapologetically stupid creationist. However, I think “tom,†'
I'm glad to see how open and 'tolerant' you darwiniacs are to debate!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAH
Comment Posted By tom On 12.08.2006 @ 21:52
Andy: notice who started calling names, you darwiniacs guess you need to 'evolve' a little more HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA
little insecure in our 'god' now aren't we??? HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Comment Posted By tom On 12.08.2006 @ 21:51
I don't have time to answer every point, I'd like to go to bed sometimes tonight!
' we can point to countless major mutations in just the last few generations that beneficial: from increased bone mass (which virtually prevents osteperosis or fracture) to immunity to LDH cholesterol to four-color vision in women.
'more bone mass is a 'mutation'??? couldn't it be just better nutrition? seriously, you type quite a bit, but it doesn't make much sense.
'The fossil record is perfectly consistent with evolution in every respect. Citing the “cambrian explosion†as proof against evolution just a buzzword that creationists use: there’s nothing anti-evolutionary about it.'
I know, NOTHING IS INCONSISTENT WITH EVOLUTION!!! evolution morphs and twist to meet every new fact that comes along. of course the gradual 'genesis' of new forms is perfectly consistent with the sudden appearance of a great many creatures......ah yeah... its OBVIOUS that nothing can disprove evolution. and if nothing can disprove it, its not science....duhhhh....and if you can't measure it, its not science....and your so-called formulas aren't for evolution...but in your mind everthing is evolution, evolution is god...yadaydaydyayyady
'And now we come to the real concern: not a scientific one, but rather a fear that evolution weakens your particular belief system.'
Clowns from Voltaire to Marx have been trying to destroy christianity, and Darwin and YOU won't have any more luck...what a joke!! I have a real fear of what darwin does to a society, the 'brave new hellish world' it produces.
'Because the format for the “debate†was rigged and dishonest'
Of course, those poor evolutionists!!! everything is against them WAAAHHHHH....oh please. I thought since you darwiniacs were so far superior in every way, more 'evolved' than us 'crationists' that you'd have no problems with any arguments with us!!
'Because when people say “hey, let’s teach kids a bunch of babbling nonsense and call it science†other people say “er, no.â€'
because its hey kids, we're going to ram our god (evolution) down your throat, like it or not. again if your arguments were so superior you would welcome this. but you darwiniacs don't. and its easy to see why.
'Again, evolution is not “chance.†Not even abiogenesis is really “chance.†If you continue to insist that it is, then you are simply attacking a straw man. Your account of “panspermia†is just as ill-informed as the rest. Biologists haven’t concluded any such thing about the possibilities of abiogenesis.'
well what is it? its not a force, you say, and it DEFINATELY is arbitrary, so what is it?? admit it, its god.
'panspermia' is just an example of the outlandish things people come up with to try to confirm evolution.....nothing can every be against evolution....yeah
Comment Posted By tom On 12.08.2006 @ 21:50
Andy: you're a typical darwiniac jackazz....couldn't answer my question now, could you? typical wacko!!! if you wonder who is stupid, look in the mirror.
Comment Posted By tom On 12.08.2006 @ 21:33
Andy: thanks for illustrating my point....and why wouldn't evolution work on non-living things? Does gravity work on living and non-living things?
again, DARWINIACS have no answers, just try to silence the critics..
Comment Posted By tom On 12.08.2006 @ 20:13
plunge: Why don't you ask Richard Sternberg what happens when the god of evolution is questioned?? Why do evolutionists go to court, as in Pennsylvania, to stop any mention of any HERESY towards the god of evolution?? In Kansas, when the evolutionists were invited to debate before the school board, not one showed up? Why is that? where is this 'openness', 'willingness to engage' hmmmmm??? I see no answers coming from evolutionists, just an effort to silence critics.
All evidence is interpreted in light of a person's assumptions. Since the fossil record doesn't show evolution, especially given the cambrian explosion, we now have 'punctuated equilibrium'. Once the universe was discovered not to be eternal, and given that life cannot possibly have arisen by 'evolution' (ie chance) in that time, we have 'panspermia'.
As a science it has collapsed, as a faith it'll keep going...keep the faith!!
Comment Posted By tom On 12.08.2006 @ 20:12
As usual, darwiniacs try to substitute small genetic changes within a species 'microevolution' if you will, for macroevolution. As far as these mathematical formulas you talk about, why don't they apply evenly to all species? Why is this VAST FORCE of evolution so arbitrary?
As far as genetic drift
'But random genetic drift is even more that this. It also refers to accidental random events that influence allele frequency.'
how can you measure this? this sounds like the 'hopeful monster' or 'puncutated equilibrium' where some 'magic' happens and all of a sudden we have a new species. Same with 'selective pressure'....all trying to make the jump from small genetic changes in a population to a new creature, which doesn't happen. Since we know all that we do about genetics, why haven't we just simulated evolution in the lab? it should be easy, since this is all just 'chance', shouldn't it? we've went through thousands of generations of fruit flies in the lab...and guess what, its still a fruit fly. I have seen no evidence that genetic mutations can create a new species, invariably they are harmful.
Oh please, evolution IS a theory of origins. Evolutionists take great pains to write God out of existence. its not about science its about faith. it is a very religious doctrine, try reading Dawkins sometines. And yes, it is used a great deal in politics and economics. Hitler followed this theory to its bloody logical end. You can ignore it and pretend he didn't but it is undeniable.
Comment Posted By tom On 12.08.2006 @ 19:52
I'll tell you why no one believes evolution: its a lie.
If you were walking in a field and saw a watch, you'd think it was made by someone, but a cell, which is many, many times more complex, is just here by 'chance' and this vast force of 'evolution'...which no one can measure. There is no mathematical formula to measure evolution, like there is for other forces, such as gravity. Besides being unmeasurable, evolution is arbitrary! Oh yes, we evolve because we're *special*, but things like coelecanths, sharks, etc. do not. Of course evolution just works on living things, not on inorganic matter, for some reason....computers didn't evolve, neither did steel. Evolution sure is picky!!
Any questioning of evolution is not permitted! Oh no, those who dissent are silenced, threatened, and run out of the 'scientific' community. Evolution is the primary doctrine in the religion of humanism (liberalism), and heresy is not permitted!
this quaint 19th century idea is heading towards the dust-bin of history along with marxism and fruedianism. Thank God!
Comment Posted By tom On 12.08.2006 @ 13:54
PLEASE ELIMINATE THE WORD "ELIMINATIONIST"...AND THOSE WHO USE THE TERM
"eliminationist"
Comment Posted By Tom On 22.07.2006 @ 05:54
I think Greenwald is confusing enema play with word play.
