Comments Posted By Tom
Displaying 51 To 60 Of 109 Comments
THE DEMONS ARE STIRRING...THE CANDLE IS GUTTERING
'Crusades… Inquisition… Salem… The “Troublesâ€...'
tell me how many people were killed in those, compared to the *TENS OF MILLIONS* killed by just hitler and stalin?
Comment Posted By tom On 17.08.2006 @ 20:17
*George Wald stood up and explained that he had done extensive research on hemoglobin also,—and discovered that if just ONE mutational change of any kind was made in it, the hemoglobin would not function properly. For example, the change of one amino acid out of 287 in hemoglobin causes sickle-cell anemia. A glutamic acid unit has been changed to a valine unit—and, as a result, 25% of those suffering with this anemia die.
*Murray Eden showed that it would be impossible for even a single ordered pair of genes to be produced by DNA mutations in the bacteria, E. coli,—with 5 billion years in which to produce it! His estimate was based on 5 trillion tons of the bacteria covering the planet to a depth of nearly an inch during that 5 billion years. He then explained that the genes of E. coli contain over a trillion (1012) bits of data. That is the number 10 followed by 12 zeros. *Eden then showed the mathematical impossibility of protein forming by chance. He also reported on his extensive investigations into genetic data on hemoglobin (red blood cells).
*the above disproves evolution* not that it matters to TRUE BELIEVERS!
Comment Posted By tom On 17.08.2006 @ 20:12
“I wish I were younger. What inclines me now to think you may be right in regarding [evolution] as the central and radical lie in the whole web of falsehood that now governs our lives *is not so much your arguments against it as the fanatical and twisted attitudes of its defenders.â€*
-Dr. C.S. Lewis, in letter to Capt. Bernard Acworth of the Evolution Protest Movement, 1951.you two darwiniacs prove Mr. Lewis right (as usual)
Comment Posted By tom On 17.08.2006 @ 20:11
'Call me when you see Richard Dawkins fly a plane into a church, will you? Even though he thinks you’re a bunch of idiots, he’s not going to kill you for it (after all, no virgins for us atheists!).'
Hitler and Stalin have shown what you darwiniacs are capable of.
I have a question: are you as stupid as your writings?
Comment Posted By tom On 17.08.2006 @ 20:09
Furthermore, with the adoption of the evolutionary approach in non-biological fields, from cosmology to human affairs, we are beginning to realize that biological evolution is only one aspect of evolution in general. Evolution in the extended sense can be defined as a directional and essentially irreversible process occurring in time, which in its course gives rise to an increase of variety and an increasingly high level of organization, in its products. Our present knowledge indeed forces us to the view that the whole of reality is evolution—a single process of self-transformation. What is Science (1955) p.278 Julian Huxley
We cannot understand much of the history of late 19th and early 20th century anthropology, with its plethora of taxonomic names proposed for nearly every scrap of fossil bone, unless we appreciate its obsession with the identification and ranking of races. For many schemes of classification sought to tag the various fossils as ancestors of modern races and to use their relative age and apishness as a criterion for racial superiority. ~ Stephen Jay Gould
Origin of Species: The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life by Charles Darwin
Looking to the world at no very distant date, what an endless number of the lower races will have been eliminated by the higher civilized races throughout the world. ~ Charles Darwin
At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate and replace, the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes ... will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now, between the Negro or Australian and the gorilla. ~ Charles Darwin
No rational man, cognizant of the facts, believes that the average negro is the equal, still less the superior, of the white man. And if this be true, it is simply incredible that, when all his disabilities are removed, and our prognathous relative has a fair field and no favour, as well as no oppressor, he will be able to compete successfully with his bigger-brained and smaller-jawed rival, in a contest which is to be carried out by thoughts and not by bites. ~ Thomas Huxley
good scientific RACISM.
I began to speak of God, Joseph (Stalin) heard me out, and after a moment's silence, said:
'You know, they are fooling us, there is no God. . . .'
I was astonished at these words, I had never heard anything like it before.
'How can you say such things, Soso?' I exclaimed.
'I'll lend you a book to read; it will show you that the world and all living things are quite different from what you imagine, and all this talk about God is sheer nonsense,' Joseph said.
'What book is that?' I enquired.
'Darwin. You must read it,' Joseph impressed on me. ~ G. GlurdjidzeIf Nature does not wish that weaker individuals should mate with the stronger, she wishes even less that a superior race should intermingle with an inferior one; because in such a case all her efforts, throughout hundreds of thousands of years, to establish an evolutionary higher stage of being, may thus be rendered futile. ~ Adolf Hitler
*National Socialism is nothing but applied biology. ~ Rudolph Hess*
and finally to describe you darwiniacs:
"I wish I were younger. What inclines me now to think you may be right in regarding [evolution] as the central and radical lie in the whole web of falsehood that now governs our lives is not so much your arguments against it as the fanatical and twisted attitudes of its defenders."
Comment Posted By tom On 17.08.2006 @ 19:35
-Dr. C.S. Lewis, in letter to Capt. Bernard Acworth of the Evolution Protest Movement, 1951.
The doubt that has infiltrated the previously smug confident certitude of evolutionary biology's last twenty years has inflamed passions . . There has been a total lack of agreement even within the warring camps . . Things are really in an uproar these days . . Sometimes it seems as though there are as many variations on each [evolutionary] theme as there are individual biologists."—*Niles Eldredge, "Evolutionary Housecleaning," in Natural History, February 1982, pp. 78, 81.
looks like you can have your own private evolution! this makes evolution really new age! why don't you stand at the seashore and yell I AM EVOLUTION at the top of your lungs...ala shirley mcclain!
An increasing number of scientists, most particularly a growing number of evolutionists . . argue that Darwinian evolutionary theory is no genuine scientific theory at all . . Many of the critics have the highest intellectual credentials."—*Michael Ruse, "Darwin's Theory: An Exercise in Science," in New Scientist, June 25, 1981, p. 828.
not science? what COULD it be??
I found another quote from that 'hick' wald:
*George Wald stood up and explained that he had done extensive research on hemoglobin also,—and discovered that if just ONE mutational change of any kind was made in it, the hemoglobin would not function properly. For example, the change of one amino acid out of 287 in hemoglobin causes sickle-cell anemia. A glutamic acid unit has been changed to a valine unit—and, as a result, 25% of those suffering with this anemia die.
*Murray Eden showed that it would be impossible for even a single ordered pair of genes to be produced by DNA mutations in the bacteria, E. coli,—with 5 billion years in which to produce it! His estimate was based on 5 trillion tons of the bacteria covering the planet to a depth of nearly an inch during that 5 billion years. He then explained that the genes of E. coli contain over a trillion (1012) bits of data. That is the number 10 followed by 12 zeros. *Eden then showed the mathematical impossibility of protein forming by chance. He also reported on his extensive investigations into genetic data on hemoglobin (red blood cells).
another 'hick' there are a bunch of them! anti-science HERETICS....you need a good evolutionary JIHAD on em!
At this meeting, held at the American Museum of Natural History in New York City, *Colin Patterson, senior paleontologist at the British Museum of Natural History, in a paper that he presented to the assembly, declared before his peers that evolution was "positively anti-knowledge," and added that "all my life I had been duped into taking evolution as revealed truth."
'revealed truth' why would evolution present itself like that? sounds like a religion!
To their chagrin [scientists] have no clear-cut answer, because chemists have never succeeded in reproducing nature's experiments on the creation of life out of nonliving matter. Scientists do not know how that happened . . Scientists have no proof that life was not the result of an act of creation."—*Robert Jastrow, The Enchanted Loom: Mind in the Universe (1981), p. 19.
"Darwinism removed the whole idea of God as the Creator of organisms from the sphere of rational discussion. Darwin pointed out that no supernatural designer was needed; since natural selection could account for any new form of life, there is no room for a supernatural agency in its evolution."—*Julian Huxley, "At Random, A Television Preview," in Evolution after Darwin (1960), p. 41.
Why would Huxley talk about getting rid of God? I thought evolution was science! HAHHAHAHAAHAHAH
Comment Posted By tom On 17.08.2006 @ 18:58
'The scientific american is not a science journal, but a popular magazine in which lots of different people state their opinions. It’s pretty laughable that you’d quote it, and no less, quote something from 1954: before we had any sort of good grasp of genetics, before Miller-Urey, etc. Are you really that desperate that this was the best you could find?'
Funny that you would diss George wald:
George Wald
The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1967http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/1967/wald-bio.html
When you get your nobel prize, let me know HAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH
Comment Posted By tom On 17.08.2006 @ 17:18
and it cannot be disproved…â€
There are a million different ways to disprove it
really? name one. All of science used to beleive the universe was eternal, and the big bang was thought to be a death blow to evolution, since there was not enough time for all of these 'chance' things to happen, to evolve life from inorganics and make it as complex as it is..but evolution 'evolved' just like it always does, to fit any fact that comes along and threatens it.....your reaction to a threat to your 'god' is just another example!!!
Comment Posted By tom On 17.08.2006 @ 17:14
Evolution comprises all the stages of the development of the universe: the cosmic, biological, and human or cultural developments. Attempts to restrict the concept of evolution to biology are gratuitous. Life is a product of the evolution of inorganic nature, and man is a product of the evolution of life. In a sense, the discovery of evolution reinstates man in the station from which he was demoted by Copernicus: man is again the center of the stage--at least of the planetary, and quite possibly of the cosmic one. Most important of all, the stage and the actor not only have evolved but are evolving.
-- Theodosius Dobzhansky, ``Changing Man,'' Science, Vol. 155, No. 3761, p. 409, 1967
and I should believe you over Sir Arthur Keith, when it comes to Hitler and evolution.....yeah.....just like I believe you when you define 'evolution'
to say that its just about 'science' shows how little you know.
Comment Posted By tom On 17.08.2006 @ 17:12
G.A. Kerkut defined the ‘General Theory of Evolution’ in his 1960 book 'Implications of Evolution' as
"the theory that all the living forms in the world have arisen from a single source which itself came from an inorganic form." Some dictionaries still define it similarly, such as the Oxford Concise Science Dictionary: "evolution: The gradual process by which the present diversity of plant and animal life arose from the earliest and most primitive organisms, which is believed to have been continuing for the past 3000 million years."
evolution, concept that embodies the belief that existing animals and plants developed by a process of gradual, continuous change from previously existing forms. This theory, also known as descent with modification, constitutes organic evolution. Inorganic evolution, on the other hand, is concerned with the development of the physical universe from unorganized matter. Organic evolution, as opposed to belief in the special creation of each individual species as an immutable form, conceives of life as having had its beginnings in a simple primordial protoplasmic mass (probably originating in the sea) from which, through the long eras of time, arose all subsequent living forms.
http://www.infoplease.com/ce6/sci/A0817988.html
again you're a liar. the depths to which you go to defend your faith are admirable! I'm sure if you were a muslim, you'd be yelling 'allah akbar' and holing a machete!!!
Comment Posted By tom On 17.08.2006 @ 17:03
