Comments Posted By Thers
Displaying 1 To 4 Of 4 Comments
WARMIST ADVOCATES REFUSE TO DIFFERNIATE BETWEEN 'DENIERS' AND 'SKEPTICS'
#4, no, they don't. They show, in fact, an appropriate amount of "skepticism." Also they have nothing substantive to do with what I linked to.
Comment Posted By Thers On 7.12.2009 @ 13:03
Of course there are two sides to every story, Briffa's side is a lot more convincing than the one you tell here.
http://deepclimate.org/2009/10/30/briffa-teaches-but-will-mcintyre-ever-learn/
Comment Posted By Thers On 6.12.2009 @ 13:40
I WILL MISS THE LEFT'S BUSH DERANGEMENT
Try again, Pal. I write what I write because I want to write about it. I could care less what I’ve written the previous day or week or month. I don’t defend Bush or castigate him. I write what I believe and what I see. I will take on conservatives, liberals, Republicans, Democrats, religious nuts, anti-science boobs, and people named Chuck who have shit for brains. And I will do it when I want, and for whatever reason strikes me as sound at the time.
It is very sad that you use such bad language when you engage your critics. Don't you realize that this shows you have an impoverished vocabulary? You sound very angry. Go have a cream soda or something.
Thanks for the link; this has been hugely entertaining in every sense of the word. Do try to calm down though, sport. You sound unwell.
Comment Posted By Thers On 20.01.2009 @ 00:32
BLOG SERIES ON "WHAT AILS CONSERVATISM?" STARTS TOMORROW
Oh, I'll certainly be joining you, given the sophisticated rebuttal you've made to my FDL post.
Comment Posted By Thers On 25.05.2008 @ 15:50
