Comments Posted By Svenghouli
Displaying 41 To 50 Of 82 Comments
Folks just remember innocent until proven guilty only works if you are OJ.
Comment Posted By Svenghouli On 3.06.2006 @ 17:33
WHAT THE LEFT REALLY WANTS FROM HADITHA
Sorry guys
but the line that reads:
I find it funny, because lunatics on the left receive more adoration on the right.
should read:
I find it funny, because lunatics on the left receive more adoration than the crazies on the far right.
and Dan l:
You are wrong. It has to do with ManBear Pig.
Comment Posted By Svenghouli On 2.06.2006 @ 19:40
Speaking of Big Oil. I wonder how many liberals are mad because Hugo Chavez has been promoting raising the price of gasoline since coming into power in 1999. The way he planned to do this was reduce production. This would create shortgages. I think we are fortunate that OPEC ixnayed that idea earlier this week. I find it funny, because lunatics on the left receive more adoration on the right. For example, take the comparison between the Hugo Chavez and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. They both hate America. They both really dislike Jews. They believe in nationalizing of industries. They both see Bush as either as Hitler or Great Satan. Yet, Chavez is the worshipped by Harry Bellefonte, Danny Glover, Cindy Sheehan, and by British Progressive MPs. Why is that? I think this kind of goes with what dan l is talking about. It is that blind sense of rebellion against establishment. My father remembers when he came to the US in the '60s. There were many students who sang the praises of Chairman Mao and Che Guevara. They forget that those leaders were inept or even to a certain degree vicious. It didn't matter because those individuals promoted the rebellious progressive ideal. I suppose in some minds the end justify the means.
Comment Posted By Svenghouli On 2.06.2006 @ 12:06
COUNTDOWN TO GERMANY: TEAM USA
Speaking of soccer, how sweet was our beating Venezuela last Friday?
Comment Posted By Svenghouli On 31.05.2006 @ 16:36
TALKING TO IRAN A NECESSARY EVIL
Rick:
I am going to refer to a couple of old post of yours. First, I am going to refer to the "Breitbart article". It is the one which states the IAEA found traces of highly enriched uranium at an Iranian site. I am just curious as to whether or not there was a follow up story.
http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/05/12/D8HI8SPG0.html
The second thing I want to say is that I was under the impression we "legally" can not do anything to Iran even if they sent warhead filled with Dookie at Capitol Hill. I mean how bad were the those concessions that Carter made?
Comment Posted By Svenghouli On 31.05.2006 @ 17:36
WHO DO YOU BELIEVE ON GLOBAL WARMING?
Rick;
Do you remember when Reagan claimed that trees emitted more pollution than cars? Do you remember laughing at such a suggestion? Well, I do. Believe it or not they actually do generate pollution. Actually, just certain types of trees such as many members of the oak family.
http://www.chennaionline.com/science/Environment/environment24.asp
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2001/01/010109223032.htm
Comment Posted By Svenghouli On 27.05.2006 @ 11:20
ILLINOIS KID'S BLOGS MUZZLED BY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Rick,
I remember in Catholic middle school; when almost my entire class go into trouble because of vulgar Mad Libs. We had to sit in detention during recess for one month.
Comment Posted By Svenghouli On 24.05.2006 @ 15:46
THE MIND BLOGGLING CONSEQUENCES OF BUSH DERANGEMENT SYNDROME
Hey Kreiz:
Bush Sr. pushed for NAFTA originally, not Clinton. It was in actuality a bipartisan affair.
"After intense political debate and the negotiation of several side agreements, the U.S. House passed NAFTA by 234-200 (132 Republicans and 102 Democrats voting in favor) and the U.S. Senate passed it by 61-38. Some opposition persists to the present day, primarily directed towards specific clauses within the agreement."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NAFTA
Sure, conservatives at times appeared to wear Tin Foil hats when dealing with Clinton, but it was no where near as bad it is today.
Comment Posted By Svenghouli On 24.05.2006 @ 23:59
ed,
Two words: Manbear Pig.
I think both parties can be accused of standing on a soap box and pontificating. Isn't it wonderful that we live in a nation that is on cruise control. Even though Republicans and Democrats say and do many stupid things; the damage is negligible. That is even if both parties scream the sky is falling when the other is in power.
Comment Posted By Svenghouli On 24.05.2006 @ 12:13
Its funny that Bush and Cheney are always potrayed as idiots. Yet, at the same time as evil. The only conclusion that I can come up with is that they believe that they are Dick Dastardly (Cheney) and Muttley (Bush). If anyone here is over 25, then they remember the cartoon "Stop the Pigeon". Many on the left while regarding these two as cartoonish imbeciles believe they are some behind major conspiracy theories. What can be implied is that the most brilliant of progressive minds were outwitted by a pair of idiots who could not hunt down a fat,little bird.
http://www.hotink.com/wacky/dastrdly/
Comment Posted By Svenghouli On 24.05.2006 @ 12:00
