Comments Posted By SShiell
Displaying 101 To 110 Of 223 Comments
PLEASE HELP OUR HOLLYWOOD FRIENDS WITH OBAMA JOKES
Q. How many angels can fit under Obama's Bus?
Comment Posted By SShiell On 18.07.2008 @ 13:05
A. There's not enough angels.
OBAMA: NOWHERE TO HIDE ON IRAQ
McCain has two problems:
First: He needs to grow a pair and challenge Obama on the points and continue to hammer him time and again on the flips and flops of this empty suit. And in so doing challenge Obama not for his inexperience but for his judgement or lack thereof - the one thing Obama himself hammered Hillary about.
B: McCain needs to gain control of the message. He cannot be spending his time reigning in bufoons like Gramm and maintain some level of attack on Obama. Obama has shown himself to be a loose cannon. If McCain can control his side of the message and be free to pound Obama, even a tainted MSM cannot hide Obama's faults entirely.
Comment Posted By SShiell On 15.07.2008 @ 11:21
After 4 years of Obama you may be whistling a different tune - namely anybody but Obama.
Comment Posted By SShiell On 18.06.2008 @ 11:09
LEFT DOESN'T HAVE A CLUE HOW TO SMEAR SOMEONE
If there is any one thing the left has learned in the past 8 years, it is that quantity has a quality all its own. Bush has been hit with the "Bush Lied" attack for so long by so many that it pervades even our daily discourse. It does not matter that there is not one shred of evidence to the charge. It does not matter that the charge has been debunked time and again - from both sides of the aisle. It does not matter that prominent Democrats are equally guilty if the claim were true. It only matters that the crap slung by the smear stuck and that is consistent with what the Left truly wants - to control and manipulate the debate, no matter what the topic, no matter what the issue.
Comment Posted By SShiell On 13.06.2008 @ 07:37
I CAN'T WAIT FOR AN OBAMA PRESIDENCY
There was once a man who held a nation in awe - who had women swoon at his speeches - whose proponents spoke of his other worldly stature - whose followers swore lifelong allegience to him. And anytime anyone bestows other worldly powers upon a person, I cringe.
Because that other man was was ADOLF HITLER.
Comment Posted By SShiell On 7.06.2008 @ 20:35
52 SECONDS OF VIDEO OF OBAMA'S PLAN FOR UNILATERAL DISARMAMENT
"Doesn’t it seem quite at odds with his 52 seconds of disarmament blather? I mean, how can one person be pro-war with a (questionable) ally, and no-nukes at the same time? This is something that does not add up."
It all makes perfect sense for someone who has absolutely no clue as to what he is talking about. The really pertinent question regarding his Foreign Policy proposals is "Does he rally understand the implications of what he is spouting?" And from my perspective the answer is fighteningly simple - NO!
Comment Posted By SShiell On 22.05.2008 @ 13:44
If Obama does half of what he has promised in this campaign regarding Foreign Policy then the Carter Presidency will look look like a success story by comparison.
Comment Posted By SShiell On 21.05.2008 @ 14:41
"Isn’t John McCain doing “bomb bomb Iran” just as scary?"
And Obama's "Bomb Pakistan to get at Bin Laden" not scary to you? Not anywhere near the same thing.
Without even mentioning Iran's development of Nuclear weaponry - Iran has created conflict through its surrogates (Hamas) in Gaza. Iran has completely destabilized Lebanon (and it is not as if Rick hasn't written about Lebanon) through its surrogate Hezbollah. Iran has provided the Iraqi Insurgency with advisors, training and munitions against our own troops in Iraq.
Bin Laden is likely hiding out in some cave in Pakistan. Obama would attack a nation whose leadership is friendly to our anti-terrorism position thereby putting that administration at risk with the more radical elements within Pakistan.
And with all that having been said, it is your idea that Obama is "less likely to get us entangled in another foreign adventure."
LOL!
Comment Posted By SShiell On 21.05.2008 @ 14:39
"I was 9 during Carter’s campaign…so my memory is more of playing cards in bicycle spokes and tree forts than politics."
Not that there is anything wrong with that.
Comment Posted By SShiell On 21.05.2008 @ 13:31
"$85 Million for 250 of the aircraft"
Correction - the $85 Million was a per aircraft cost.
Comment Posted By SShiell On 21.05.2008 @ 10:52
