Comments Posted By Rob
Displaying 31 To 40 Of 64 Comments
HIZBULLAH'S "USEFUL IDIOTS" MUM ABOUT REUTERS SCAM
Early reaction:
The republicans do it too?
Where? The libs love to accuse and then not follow-up with proof.Moreover, does the dolt not see the association he has implied along with the one he has drawn?
Reuters is a NEWS organization. Republicans are a POLITICAL party.
In one foolish statement he is making a double assertion, without explicitly stating both:
1) Reuters is a liberal (controlled) media outlet. (this is something the left never admits to. They continually whip the "MSM.")
2) The Republicans have a similar media arm/presence, because they "do it all the time."He has in backwards manner confessed to having at least part of the MSM as a liberal lap dog rather than an independent reporter of FACTS. In a direct manner he has attempted to paint the Republicans and similar manipulators of the news.
We'd like to be, but we are mighty short on lap dogs.
The left in the meantime is short on lap space, there are so many clammouring to climb up.
rob
Comment Posted By Rob On 7.08.2006 @ 15:37
CARNIVAL OF THE CLUELESS: A REBIRTH
Drewsmom,
"Sheehan could lose a few pounds," "She spits on her sons grave." Does going after a vetrans mom make you feel special?
Comment Posted By Rob On 14.07.2006 @ 07:04
A SMALL DETOUR ON OUR ROAD TO DICTATORSHIP
Robert,
Creating dictators to fight dictators is never a good policy. Neither is the business of Iran Contra which was the Regan years.
Comment Posted By Rob On 9.07.2006 @ 18:13
Brent,
To correct your statement about the Left and dictators, it was Regan who loved and armed Saddam and Bush I who loved and armed Bin Laden. As far as Fidel, the Left under Kennedy tried to assainate him, not do business with him like a Republican would. And Clinton went to war against Milosivic, again instead of trying to do business with him instead like a Republican.
Better luck next time...
Comment Posted By Rob On 6.07.2006 @ 18:22
MISSILE TESTS PROVE KIM IS "RONERY" AGAIN
You're observations may be very true on all counts.
Comment Posted By Rob On 6.07.2006 @ 22:25
LET'S TORCH THE FLAG BURNING AMENDMENT
I too am against the flag burning ammendment.
It is a wrecking ball where a claw hammer will do.
Use local law to put the pinch on these idiots.
-"Do you have a burn permit sir?"
-"Public urination is against the law, you are under arrest."
-"You cannot do that here with out a permit."
-"You are disturbing the peace."
-"I am going to have to take you into protective custody, before that group of good al' boys beats the tar out of you."
-add your own...FAR too much is being done at the Federal and State levels that should be local.
Keep it simple and donw give the idiots a rallying cry.
Rob
Comment Posted By Rob On 27.06.2006 @ 17:26
Svenghouli
The bush girl is a model? Wow, I guess theres no accounting for taste.
Comment Posted By Rob On 15.06.2006 @ 17:30
THE MIND BLOGGLING CONSEQUENCES OF BUSH DERANGEMENT SYNDROME
That all makes some sense. I would have thought there would be more security around the capital year round.
Not a looney, just a skeptic.
Comment Posted By Rob On 24.05.2006 @ 23:12
"The country was asleep."
Yet jets were scrambled over 80 times in the 9 months prior to sep. 11th. All for things such as deviated flight paths, failure to respond to air traffic controllers, stuff like that... Somehow, I don't buy that argument. Not saying it's not true, but I will need some more convincing to believe it.
One more thing, this has nothing to do with hate politics. There are plenty of level-headed skeptics that want to be convinced that the offical story is true, like myself. (I like Bush and I think his presidency will be appreciated in time.)
Again, I have to make this point: Everyone at Andrews HAD to be watching what was happening, the whole country was watching. They weren't sleeping. Or did nobody show up to work that day?
And another thing, articles such as these like to bring up links to refute conspiracy theories such as the PM "9/11 myth debunking" article as proof. However, Rick, as do others, ignore the fact that that PM article was refuted by the 9/11 cover-up community and don't bother to address their claims that much of that PM article is hogwash. (They provide logical counter-claims and point out relevant information missing in the article)
Comment Posted By Rob On 24.05.2006 @ 21:32
Conspiracy theories aside, it's so frustrating how some generalize that all people that think the gov't isn't telling the "Whole truth" about 9/11 must be tin-hat wearing fanatics, or anti-war unhinged liberals, ERRR Wrong. Theres just some things that don't add up.
For instance, someone give me a logical explanation for this little tidbit: Why were fighters not scrambled from Andrews Air Force Base after the first plane hit the WTC? Think about this; those personnel at that base were likely watching the news just like all the rest of us were. Yet nobody thought to maybe get in some planes to protect the nation's capital?
Thats the purpose of Andrews Air Force Base! But no, of course, they had no reason to suspect that anyone would attack our capitol, the media (which we we're all watching) was reporting that there were at least 4 more possible hijacked planes in the air.
The US has the most sophisticated military in the world, yet we couldn't stop a passenger plane from slamming into the pentagon 85 minutes after the first plane hit the WTC?
Give me a break and address the issue instead of attacking the tin-hat wearing straw man.
Comment Posted By Rob On 24.05.2006 @ 18:02
