Comments Posted By Pablo
Displaying 11 To 17 Of 17 Comments
REDEFINING THE ALREADY DEFINED
"Wow you chickenhawks sure turned into an army of Encyclopedia Browns in a hurry."
When you say "Chickenhawk", what do you mean by that, "Mark"?
Comment Posted By Pablo On 25.07.2006 @ 21:31
Check out the sale of daisy dukes on aisle 9 and stick to what you know.
Hey pal, unless you're willing to get in those retail trenches and program that barcode scanner, you've got no business telling someone's Daddy to go in there and do what you won't do for yourself! Besides, shouldn't you be busy doing Marine stuff?
Back to Waldo, Wikipedia may sanitize quickly enough, but Google is going to take a lttle more work.
Comment Posted By Pablo On 25.07.2006 @ 21:29
VENGENCE IS THE LORDS: JUSTICE IS OURS IN MOUSSAOUI CASE
For what it’s worth, this conservative is with you, Rick. My only wish is that Moussaoui gets hard labor, ten hours a day, six days a week, breaking rocks in the hot sun.
Breaking rocks would give him something to do. He won't even be that lucky. And he may never see the hot sun again. ADX Florence is Hell's waiting room.
Comment Posted By Pablo On 5.05.2006 @ 07:31
Doh!
...as long as there are still ongoing hostilities.
Begging your pardon...
Comment Posted By Pablo On 5.05.2006 @ 07:25
This verdict is more of a deterrent than death would have been. If the next wannabe finds himself thinking about the prospect of spending decades being caged by infidels instead of enjoying rivers of wine and a harem of virgins, then we've gained a useful result.
The humiliation in this is worth than death. That said, I really wanted a different verdict. But having convicted him of the crime, there was really no way for us to lose.
I hope you see where I’m going with this. Just because they’re in Gitmo or Bagram doesn’t make them guilty. Some kind of determination – some rudimentary form of justice must be meted out or it gives the lie to our entire legal system.
Gitmo is not part of our legal system, and we shouldn't expect it to perform as such. They don't need to be "guilty" of anything to be detained for as long as there are still.
The primary reason for their detention is to keep them off the battlefield. It isn't, nor should it be, anything more or less than that. It is not, nor should it be construed as, a reflection of our legal system.
Comment Posted By Pablo On 5.05.2006 @ 07:21
Misspellings, conspiracy theories and CAPS LOCK.
I'm sold.
Comment Posted By Pablo On 21.08.2005 @ 18:09
WHAT IS IT LIKE TO STARVE TO DEATH?
Well, if you revel in science, perhaps you should read some of it.
Comment Posted By Pablo On 20.03.2005 @ 19:57
Terminal dehydration
