"It seems to me Congress needs to do its job and define how these people will be treated in the context of our treaty obligations."
BWHAHAHAH...you think this congress is going to do it's job? They have failed to provide oversight for anything. These clowns are interested in pork and keeping their jobs...nothing else. Be real.Comment Posted By PC On 1.07.2006 @ 01:10
Huh, you mean that the Executive branch cannot just make things up that are contrary to our existing laws...or treaties we have signed...or the basic principles of human rights....man. How can that be so? It cannot be so. Why should they even pay any attention to this at all.. they will, becuase this debate is one they are going to draw the Democrats into... ten to one the Democrats buckle..... so congress can enact some "law" that will be shot doen in the courts...also. Those damn activist judges, they actually read and understand our constitution, and the law. How dare they!! Should'nt every adminstration just be able to make things up as they go along...as they see fit?Comment Posted By PC On 30.06.2006 @ 20:54
Great response to this flag burning nonsense from fighting Democrat Jim Web... seems George Felix Allen Jr and his fellow want to be's may be well advised to back off when attacking highly decorated veteran on matters of patriotism! No swift boating this time pal! ROFLMAO
http://www.webbforsenate.com/#Comment Posted By PC On 1.07.2006 @ 07:43
How about defending a free press while you are at it?Comment Posted By pc On 27.06.2006 @ 15:32
And, by the way, this program was mentioned by the POTUS, and the Treasury Secretary in 2001. No mention of that, I noticed.Comment Posted By pc On 27.06.2006 @ 16:05
What about WAPO, the Wall Street Jounal, Scarborough Country, and the dozens of other novelists who reported at the same time? What about the people who put it in books, long before the Times ever did? Simple question... do you believe the Executive branch should determine what can be published by our free press?Comment Posted By pc On 27.06.2006 @ 15:39
Bottom line, the Aministration should not be commenting on this in such a way as to confirm or deny it. They should stop crying, and start worrying about their own propaganda and press manipulation, instead of trying to use the law and abuse the 1st Amendment of CONUS. WAAAAAA. Bed wetters, all!
Coming soon to RW Nut House... we were against amnesty, before we were for it, but now we are against it yet again. Just show us the door, please!Comment Posted By pc On 27.06.2006 @ 05:23
Lol...timelines...amnesty, for the left you say...??? Laughable.Comment Posted By pc On 26.06.2006 @ 16:34
Do not foregt WAPO, and the Wall Street Journal, they broke this too. Now I know, the Times is everyones favorite whipping boy, but this is a joke.Comment Posted By pc On 27.06.2006 @ 05:26
Robert-Comment Posted By pc On 25.06.2006 @ 05:33
But we are redeploying. You think our re deployment is based on the situation on the ground, or politics? Americans will not accept anything else. It is in the news. You can read it for yourself. We are doing everything that Republicans and Democrats have been asking for... scaled withdrawl, timelines attached to milestones. Except of course, the PM call for amnesty. I believe the Senate passed a resolution about that, what, last week? Watching our politicians answer questions about that, is truly going to be a comedy show.
You want to impress me as a conservative? Slam Bush for not building an Army large enough to meet our current threats. Our military should be double the size it is right now, and we had the perfect opportunity to build a force large enough after 9/11 to re structure and get this done.
"ACCEPT IT DUDE. YOU LOST."... No bro. We all lost. We still face a massive threat from a region vital to our national interests and we do not have an Armed Forces large enough to fight this regional war. You think we are winning by getting out of Iraq? Think we created a situation there that promotes our interests? The Iraqi PM is calling the shots. You honestly believe that the Armed Forces of the United States has been well served,and that our national interests and security have been increased? You are high.