Comments Posted By Matt
Displaying 21 To 30 Of 59 Comments
This entire Liberal assault on the ABC "9/11" show is not about correcting alleged "inaccuracies". The objective is to get this show canceled and not to have it shown at all. The Lefties complaining about the show all have histories of misrepresenting the facts to their political gain. This assault is another exercise in spinning the truth to protect their collective political behinds.
Comment Posted By Matt On 9.09.2006 @ 13:45
"The Reagans" was aired on the Showtime cable channel so there was no complete cancellation.
However, Rick is on to something when he predicts the "9/11" show cancellation by ABC. I hope it won't happen but the Democrats, Liberals, Socialists, Bolsheviks and fellow travelers are in full whine so don't look for this to air.
Comment Posted By Matt On 8.09.2006 @ 10:32
Karen,
We are fortunate to live just outside of Pittsburgh and subscribe to the daily Pittsburgh Tribune-Review (pghtrib.com). This is a Libertarian newspaper, however, the stupid Liberals can't tell the difference between a Libertarian and a Conservative so they repeatedly slam the Trib.
Unfortunately, we are surrounded by Democrats as they are the majority party here in Western Pennsylvania. These Dems are unique, however, and will vote Republican when the issue is lowering taxes and national security. We all know that most Dems LOVE more taxes and are WEAK on national security and crime.
The other daily newspaper here in Pittsburgh makes the N. Y. Times look like the National Review. The Post-Gazette manipulates and slants the news using lessons learned from Pravda. It is just a den of slimy, Liberals, Socialists, Bolsheviks and fellow travelers.
The Trib website is above and I recommend the editorial and opinion page. After all, if so many Dems and scummy Liberals hate it you know it can't be all bad.
Comment Posted By Matt On 29.08.2006 @ 12:12
Please just give more detail of the “rural voter left out†argument.
The larger an electorate, the more districted elections incentivize the frontrunner (who usually becomes the winner) to "keep the losers happy" and govern them fairly. There's math behind it and everything. Primary source here, blogged about here.
Comment Posted By Matt On 30.08.2006 @ 12:19
STILL MISSING: FOX REPORTERS AND COMMON DECENCY
"Look Bernie, of course there's a liberal bias in the news. All the networks tilt left." -- CBS NEWS President Andrew Heyward, to six-time EMMY award winner Bernard Goldberg. FOX News is not part of the liberal-left broadcast media and, therefore, is not subject to decent treatment in any form by the horrid liberal media. Common decency does not extend to FOX News nor any news outlet that strays from the liberal-left propaganda that the old print and broadcast media call "news". It is a common character defect of the liberal, who while professing the most high-minded, decent standards of behavior, will in reality kick and stomp the opposition while they are down. In this case, the petulant liberal news outlets simply ignore the plight of the missing FOX News journalists.
Comment Posted By Matt On 22.08.2006 @ 18:53
The raving moonbats will "GET" Joe just like they "GOT" Karl Rove! Remember - ole Karl was supposed to be in the slammer by now! Something about outing a covert CIA agent or some other moonbat nonsense.
Comment Posted By Matt On 21.08.2006 @ 13:03
WHAT THE LEFT REALLY WANTS FROM HADITHA
I like how O'Reilly was lying about the WWII massacre and saying "well this happens all the time." Sorry but Olbermann let him have it for that.
And Rick, theres no evidence that people at Guantanomo did anything. They have no legal representation and aren't charged with anything. Alot like holding the Jews.
Comment Posted By Matt On 2.06.2006 @ 22:34
ABC NEWS CALL MONITORING: WHAT'S GOING ON?
That's why we need to have open and full hearings. Without them we may only assume the worst of this administration, which has earned our distrust.
Comment Posted By matt On 16.05.2006 @ 09:18
I gathered that the boyfriend was hired to steal Lynn's wallet and his key card. I guess I could be proven wrong shortly.
The Chinese wanted Jack but someone (Cummings, as I guess it turned out) sent a Secret Service guy to kill him. Presumably Cummings was the former President's chief of staff, too, and wasn't in a position to run around ordering Jack killed within hours of Logan's taking over on day four. I think by now if the Chinese show up Logan or whoever is President at the end of the day owes Jack some protection.
As long as we're clear that Chloe can violate someone's constitutional rights. Is there anything she can't do? I say no.
Comment Posted By Matt On 7.03.2006 @ 11:31
You don't want to start an argument over whether the Miranda warnings are constitutional rights, do you? :)
Whether Jack can violate any constitutional rights at all would depend on whether his working for CTU "on a provisional basis" gave him the color of state authority. Did Miriam even know Jack was associated in any way with CTU when she let him in? She thought he was dead, like everybody else. A private citizen can't violate anybody's constitutional rights. (Chloe can!)
Tony probably has a Sec. 1983 lawsuit against Bill, the doctors and CTU for not telling him about Michelle.
Comment Posted By Matt On 7.03.2006 @ 10:22
