I refuse to consider this story until I have seen B. Hussein Obama's birth certificate. One trumped up issue at a time, please.Comment Posted By HyperIon On 28.05.2009 @ 15:14
Will "the base" go for Crist?Comment Posted By HyperIon On 15.05.2009 @ 14:48
Did "the base" go for Mitt?
IMO it is never a good idea to cite Daniel "Crack" Pipes. But then you did title the post "News From the Fringes".Comment Posted By HyperIon On 6.05.2009 @ 16:44
heinous crime?Comment Posted By HyperIon On 24.04.2009 @ 11:18
i went back and searched the archives.
this is an equally good post =>
http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/08/04/a-personal-tipping-point/Comment Posted By HyperIon On 21.04.2009 @ 11:33
Thanks for writing this...finally.
But it took you too long.
I do not understand why.
All you guys who FINALLY come around, could you spend more time reflecting on WHY you ever defended this?
I'm completely serious. If we could understand that, it would be a big step forward. Something changed...what was it? Was it the release of the memos that convinced you that the ugly stories that have been circulating for YEARS were true?Comment Posted By HyperIon On 20.04.2009 @ 18:39
DSmith (#7) wrote: If Limbaugh is so marginalizing, why is he so popular?
wow. so marginalizing in itself leads to unpopularity? i never suspected that.Comment Posted By HyperIon On 13.04.2009 @ 16:38
RM wrote: CPAC was not set up to deal with these questions. But it just might start a conversation...
I've been following CPAC and IMO it's just more of the same. Could you reference something that *might* be a conversation starter?
Not these agenda items, I fear.
Targets of the Fairness Doctrine?
Al Franken and ACORN: How Liberals are Destroying the American Election System
Hon. John BoltonComment Posted By HyperIon On 27.02.2009 @ 12:29
Surrender is Not an Option: Defending America at the United Nations
Why don't you remove the second comma from the lead sentence this time? That way it is less obvious that you just copy/paste the previous one with a new date.
Didn't I ban you for similar nonsensical crap? I mean, Jesus - I know you're just a kid but haven't you got anything better to do with your time than counting fucking commas?
Get a life, youngster. And remember - stay in school.
ed.Comment Posted By HyperIon On 24.02.2009 @ 17:44
RM wrote: How much of the Movement’s unquestioning support of capitalism was in response to the latter view espoused by many on the left to this day?
Ok, Mr. Examined Life, here's question to ponder. I myself have posed it before and have witnessed another half dozen people do the same.
WHY is it always the other guy (i.e., TEH LEFT) who is always to blame for whatever issue you are considering? For example, the recent GOGGLE BOMB episode. Your response was: I only jumped to a false conclusion because in the past GOGGLE-blah-blah.
That was not the first time you have responded to being called out on an error by saying essentially "Somebody may have been a jerk in the past so that's why I'm a jerk now." That's really lame and makes you look like a moron but evidently it's your go-to response
What I quoted from you above is just another attempt to rationalize how conservatism ran off the rails: THE LEFT made us do it...it's THEIR fault because they said nasty things about capitalism!
At some level you realize the bad place the Repubs are. But you seemingly cannot face the fact that Repubs made this bed and now you ALL will have to sleep in it. Interestingly the Repub base is down to folks that don't really cotton to your type of conservative. So I'm thinking that your future holds lots of navel-gazing and teeth-gnashing.
So...insert comments to the effect that I am a blithering idiot, etc. It's SO charming when you do that!
Um...Why not read Tanenhaus's essay? I was responding to what he wrote. And he wrote that conservatives were reacting to what the left was doing in the 60's and 70's.
Geez, what a dunce.
ed.Comment Posted By HyperIon On 6.02.2009 @ 15:34