Comments Posted By Fritz
Displaying 71 To 80 Of 146 Comments
THE POLITICS OF PERSONAL DECONSTRUCTION
I couldn't wait for the 6am east coast feed of the Today Show this morning. Democrats were on the defensive. Thank you Ronald Reagan for the revolution. Alito is the finishing touch.
Comment Posted By Fritz On 12.01.2006 @ 14:15
HOW MSNBC'S CRAIG CRAWFORD SAVED MY DAY
Colo Bob,
Comment Posted By Fritz On 29.12.2005 @ 12:02
Why the Mary Mapes approach to Bush? The liberals fascination with the President's personal conduct during his youth is striking hypocrisy.
Rick,
This is even better. Unborn humans having no civil liberties, I think a fetus would rather endure water boarding over vacuum decapitation.http://crawfordslist.blogspot.com/2005/12/constitutional-relativism.html
Constitutional Relativism
Craig Crawford: "What I find fascinating is that here`s a president who constantly talks about strict constructionism. For example, when it comes to the privacy right, the underpinning of Roe v. Wade, he wants a very restrictive view of the Constitution. But when he talks about his own power, suddenly it gets very broad, and not strict constructionism in the least." (MSNBC "Hardball" 12/26)
Comment Posted By Fritz On 29.12.2005 @ 10:40
PUBLIC EXECUTIONS: LIVE AND IN COLOR?
Rick,
Comment Posted By Fritz On 13.12.2005 @ 16:05
After the first few executions, the public would become de-sensitized. The moonbats have greater outrage for Tookie than they did for Nick Berg's beheading. We could make the same argument that abortions should be televised. I think it is more about the sense of the morality of the action to kill. Abortion is innocent life to one, a clump of tissue to others. Death penalty is elimination of guilty human, a waste of opportunity for redemption for others. Only 60 years ago we nuked two cities and were prepared to nuke a third if Japan hadn't surrendered, could you imagine what Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan and Baghdad would look like if 9/11 had happened in 1945? Murder is something we don't tolerate, having the death penalty is like having a powerful military, a tool available to make sure advisories will pay the ultimate price.
Ed is a democrat, lawyer like. The enemy is the ancient Arabian death culture, like the Roman General when asked 250 AD why Rome hadn't conquered the entire Arabian peninsula, he told them that the people were of a savage nature, that considered death by natural causes as unworthy. He said there was no real value to gain and they would ultimately have to slaughter everyone. 1800 years later, we are Rome and can not conquer militarily the Arabian peninsula. We have far greater reason to attack Saudi Arabia for 9/11 than Iraq, but such an effort would inflame the entire Muslim world and be disastrous. Name an Arab country that we could attack with an adaptive culture to democracy and has a historical regional influence, Iraq. Democracy is the only and least destructive weapon to civilians available to destroy this enemy. Democrats are our Sunni insurgency, doing everything possible to prevent progress. In Iraq and the United States, they will both fail.
Comment Posted By Fritz On 7.12.2005 @ 17:52
BEARS-PACKERS PREDICTION: PAIN
Rick,
Comment Posted By Fritz On 3.12.2005 @ 16:47
Watching the game last week it was evident, Favre will throw on this team. My favorite game came early in Brett's career, when the Bears offense didn't score a point but Favre threw for close to 400 yards, and lost. As a Packer fan raised in the Lombardi era, I moved to Chicago in 1985 and liked the Bears. They were good, too bad Ditka's ego got in the way. The season for me is over, but I love to watch #4. Just another season, a new QB for the Bears, but Favre the rock. My favorite coach against Favre, Dave Wannstedt. How many times did he leave time on the clock before half-time to give Brett an opportunity to score. He was that generous when he coached for Miami too.
How dare they capitulate to the anti-Iraq Left. We are on the tip of winning the war in Iraq and they are surrendering? This is Vietnam all over again, we didn't elect Republican majority to make nice with Georgetown. This is worse than Democrats voting for the war out of political considerations in 2002. If they think the Meirs nomination brought out us wingnuts, this is tantamount to treason.
Comment Posted By Fritz On 15.11.2005 @ 09:20
Rick,
Comment Posted By Fritz On 27.10.2005 @ 15:01
This is a great day. While the Left will spin this as weakness or caving to the wing nut conservatives, the truth is, conservatives held to their core principles without personally attacking Miers. I gave Miers the benefit of the doubt and held my reservations until the hearings. When the speech information began to appear, it was clear that Miers was not suitable for the Court. There had been no mention of democrats in this debate, Roe was not the issue but the clear standards of judicial adherence to the Constitution. I think it can be said, this is a victory for the Party and the Conservative movement. The David Gurgens, Andy Cards, old GOP get along with Georgetown crowd have been defeated once and for all. Bush 41 paid a high price to acquiesce to them, Bush 43 almost made the same mistake. Powell was a terrible Secretary of State, a principled Rice has accomplished more in 6 months than the lovable Georgetown Powell could ever expect to. This is the beginning of Bush's rise to real power, winning the judicial fight on principle, will make them fear him.
IRONY PILED ON TOP OF ABSURDITY IN L'AFFAIRE d'PLAME
Rick,
"The way in which the leak investigation is being pursued is becoming a symbol of who was right and who was wrong about the war," said Ivo H. Daalder, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution who worked at the National Security Council during the Clinton administration.This is the narrative the Left wishes were what the investigation is about. They will keep trying, but the Arab's in the region will decide who was right or wrong. My money is on democracy.
Comment Posted By Fritz On 25.10.2005 @ 06:28
Rick,
Comment Posted By Fritz On 10.10.2005 @ 10:25
I thought conservatives believed in constitutional originalism? These Bork judicial activists give conservatism a bad name. Justice Scalia paid greater deference to the President than these loudmouths. Let the process go forward, if she proves to be unqualified, she will not be confirmed.
