Where exactly did you see me state my opinion of the US government, and how is it relevant to the discussion the extremely poor quality of the Troofers arguments and total lack of evidence?
And what are the names of the six allegedly "alive-and-well" 9/11 hijackers?Comment Posted By Frank IBC On 24.08.2007 @ 14:35
The fact that you can't be bothered to list even one of the allegedly "alive-and-well hijackers" shows that your argument is a farce. It's the height of intellectual laziness.
I repeated your question on the Pentagon, because it makes no sense as you wrote it. Could you please try to translate what you said into coeherent English? What on earth does "What can possibly be so secretive about a plane hitting the Pentagon" actually mean? What are you asking me to prove or disprove?Comment Posted By Frank IBC On 24.08.2007 @ 14:11
Thank goodness for our leaders who are nothing of the sort.
And that is supposed to defend your jibberish... exactly how?Comment Posted By Frank IBC On 24.08.2007 @ 13:58
So who are the six hijackers that are still alive and well?
And what is so secretive about a plane hitting the Pentagon?Comment Posted By Frank IBC On 24.08.2007 @ 13:56
Why are at least 6 of the hijackers still known to be alive and well?
Of the 19 listed in post #167, to which six are you referring?
What can possibly be so secretive about a plane hitting the Pentagon?
I don't know, what was so secretive about a plane hitting the Pentagon?Comment Posted By Frank IBC On 24.08.2007 @ 13:42
What about Bushâ€™s brother being in charge of security until the final day when the contract ended?
Marvin Bush, George W.â€™s brother, was on the board of directors of Stratestec, formerly known as Securacom, the publically-owned firm which had a contract to provide security for the WTC. He did NOT manage the day-to-day operations of the firm, let alone its operations at the WTC. He left the board in June 2000. Which last I checked, was 7 months before his brother assumed the Presidency and 15 months before 9/11. Marvin was no longer even a shareholder at the end of 2000.Comment Posted By Frank IBC On 24.08.2007 @ 13:39
Fire can weaken steel. This is true. But can it weaken it sufficiently to cause two 100+ storey buildings to collapse in 10 seconds?
In addition to the thousands of gallons of kerosene which were ignited and dispersed upon the crash of the plane, you need two other ingredients:
1) Heavy structural damage, and
And if you say that you have never been told this before, you're lying.
"Pull it", in the actual context in which that remark was made means "pull the firemen out of the building".
And if you say that you have never been told this before, you're lying, again.
(repeat of my post #187)
-Millions of tons of burning debris from the fallen towers. A good chunk of the lower part of the north face of the building was wiped out by the falling debris, and the fire had burned for seven hours.
-Transfer truss (a â€œbridgeâ€) over ConEd facility, which created a vulnerable point in the structure.
-Thousands of gallons of diesel fuel, for Mayorâ€™s Emergency Command Center, stored in that building.
And if you say that you have never, ever had this explained to you before, you are lying, yet again.Comment Posted By Frank IBC On 24.08.2007 @ 13:00
What I was trying to convey is that it takes a long time for the truth to spread to the majority.
Apparently to you "truth" and "evidence and logic" are somehow independent of each other. To you, "truth" is a religious belief that is spread through emotional appeals, rather than something that is arrived at after careful study.
The reason that "the majority" does not believe the Troofers' babblings is because they are so obviously bats##t crazy.
what a relief, our government is ok after all.
I do not decide on what to believe based on whether I will feel "relieved that our government is OK after all". I decide what to believe based on evidence and logic. Both of which are sorely lacking in the Troofers' Bu$hitler-inside job-controlled demolition scenario. And that's all it is, just a scenario, totally lacking in evidence, pushed by a bunch of wackos who couldn't form a coherent, persuasive argument if you held a gun to their heads.Comment Posted By Frank IBC On 24.08.2007 @ 12:37
A friend of mine once said...
"Whenever I hear someone utter the magic phrase 'wake up', I take the phone off the hook, roll over and go back to sleep."Comment Posted By Frank IBC On 24.08.2007 @ 11:55
Your argument is as follows:
1) Past governments have been very very bad.
2) #1 is proof that our present government is very very bad.
3) #2 is proof that the WTC was brought down in a controlled-implosion conspiracy, an inside job by the Bu$hitler administration.
Sorry, but your understanding of logic is extremely faulty.Comment Posted By Frank IBC On 24.08.2007 @ 11:53